Filter This View

  • Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10

    Publication Date: 2012-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Justice Alan D. Scheinkman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The following papers numbered 1 to 87 were read on (1) the motion (Seq. No. 11) by respondent, Janet T. Callaghan ("Callaghan"), for an Order to vacate any default with regard to the October 28, 2011 Order of this Court, as modified by the February 8, 2012 Order of this Court, that so-ordered subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum on respondent, to grant renewal and/or to vacate the aforementioned February 8, 2012 Order of this Court to delete certain provisions therefrom, and to grant a protective order pursuant to CPLR 5240; (2) the motion (Seq. No. 12) by petitioner, Curtis & Associates, P.C. ("Curtis"), to stay the return date on the foregoing motion (Seq. No. 11); (3) the motion by petitioner Curtis (Seq. No. 14) to cite Callaghan for civil and/or criminal contempt for alleged failure to comply with prior discovery Orders of this Court; (4) the motion by respondent Callaghan (Seq. No. 15) to vacate such parts of the May 11, 2012 Order of this Court that directed respondent to appear personally before this Court on June 8, 2012, and provided that no further motions be made except upon prior written consent of this Court, and granting sanctions against petitioner in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00); and (5) this Court's inquiry as to whether the conduct herein of respondent's counsel, Jeffrey Levitt, Esq., is sanctionable pursuant to Part 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules of Trial Court:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11831/10

    Cite as: Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10, NYLJ 1202565654161, at *1 (Sup., WE, Decided July 24, 2012)Justice Alan D. Scheinkmanp

  • May 17, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Matter of Ostad, petitioner v. New York State Department of Health, respondents

    Decided May 10 2007Before Crew III, J.P.; Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Public Health Law �230-c

    1 minute read

  • October 4, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Matter of Thompson, appellant v. Genesee County Sheriff�s Department, respondents

    Decided Sept. 27, 2007Before Mercure, J.P.; Crew, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ.Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed December 14, 2005, which ruled that th

    1 minute read

  • March 24, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Appellate Division Review

    Not to be outdone by Mother Nature this winter, during December 2004-February 2005, the four departments of the New York Appellate Division generated not just a flurry, but a blizzard of opini

    1 minute read

  • November 7, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    How One State's Law May Reshape the Vioxx Litigation

    A recent class action decision, according to some in the pharmaceutical industry,1 threatens to expose Merck to billions of dollars in liability. The decision, Internatio

    1 minute read

  • October 3, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing

    In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, A-90 September Term 2010; Supreme Court; opinion by LaVecchia, J.; dissent by Hoens,

    1 minute read

  • February 27, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Editorials

    Gouging In the 1940s, with gasoline rationing and price controls, oil as a scarce commodity was apportioned as fairly as possible under the circumstances, with its price kept a

    1 minute read

  • June 9, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Brown v. Greiner

    Decided June 3, 2005Before Walker, Ch.J., Leval, and Katzmann, C.JJ. Consolidated appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (

    1 minute read

  • February 27, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    J. P. Doumak Inc. v. Westgate Financial Corp.

    Decided Feb. 19, 2004Before Buckley, J.P.; Nardelli, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ. Defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman,

    1 minute read

  • April 29, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Hirsch, petitioner-appellant v. Stewart, respondent-respondent

    Decided April 23, 2009 Before Mazzarelli, J.P. Saxe, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse, JJ. Petitioner appeals from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of the

    1 minute read