• Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 603755/08

    Publication Date: 2010-11-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Before: Richard T. Andrias, J.P., David B. Saxe, John W. Sweeny, Jr., James M. Catterson, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, New York (William A. Maher, Vincent T. Chang and Randall R. Rainer of counsel), for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, New York (Richard A. Rosen, John F. Baughman, Farrah R. Berse and Jennifer K. Vakiener of counsel), for respondent.

    Case Number: 603755/08

    Cite as: Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 603755/08, NYLJ 1202475335060, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided November 23, 2010)Before: Richa

  • Matter of Alphonso W.

    Publication Date: 2004-06-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Santucci, J.P.; Miller, Schmidt and Fisher, JJ. In the Matter of Alphonso W. (Anonymous), ap (Docket No. D-01793/03) In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Fami

  • Kencar Associates, LLC v Town of Kent

    Publication Date: 2006-03-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Gail Prudenti, P.J.; Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ. Kencar Associates, LLC, ap, v. Town of Kent, res (Index No. 1325/03) In an action for reimbursement

  • In the Matter of Kahn

    Publication Date: 2006-10-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: D-97-06

    Decided and Entered: October 12, 2006 D-97-06 ____________________________________ In the Matter of ARTHUR M. KAHN, an Attorney. COMMITTEE ON PROFESS

  • People v Langhorne

    Publication Date: 2007-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    MASTRO, J.P., RITTER, SKELOS, CARNI and McCARTHY, JJ. The People, etc., respondent, v Torrence Langhorne, appellant. (Ind. No. 00476-05) Robert C. Mitchell,

  • Morrison v 107 West 38th Realties Co.

    Publication Date: 2005-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Florio, J.P.; Krausman, Luciano and Fisher, JJ. Joan Morrison, appellant, v. 107 West 38th Realties Co., res (and a third-party action) (Index No. 16857/0

  • June 5, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Malpractice Claim Proceeds Against Shearman & Sterling A Manhattan appellate court has allowed a legal malpractice suit to proceed against Shearman &

    1 minute read

  • Matter of Goldman v Chapman

    Publication Date: 2007-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2007-01159

    ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, J.P. FRED T. SANTUCCI RUTH C. BALKIN THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ. In the Matter of Jeffrey Goldman, petitioner- respondent, v Charles Chapman, et al., appell

  • Haines v Haines

    Publication Date: 2007-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2006-07404

    ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P. STEVEN W. FISHER ROBERT A. LIFSON EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ. Deborah B. Haines, respondent, v Gregory L. Haines, appellant. (Index No. 150/03)

  • KITAK SONG, ap, v. DANIEL OIZUMI res

    Publication Date: 2013-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Balkin, J.P.; Lott, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    KITAK SONG, ap, v. DANIEL OIZUMI res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, K