Filter This View

  • New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Publication Date: 2010-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-17
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-1457

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 7572 NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P., PETITIONER v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD p id=

  • New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Publication Date: 2010-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-17
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-1457

    NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P., PETITIONER v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD No. 08-1457 p class="jurisd

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

    Publication Date: 2002-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Ginsburg
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-131

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)This case concerns the fees that may be awarded attorneys who successfully represent Social Security benefits claimants in court. Under 42 U. S. C. �406(b) (1994 ed. and Supp.

  • Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2012-05-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-1472

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 5416 KOUICHI TANIGUCHI, Petitioner v. KAN PACIFIC SAIPAN, LTD., DBA MARIANAS RESORT A

  • Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2012-05-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-1472

    KOUICHI TANIGUCHI, Petitioner v. KAN PACIFIC SAIPAN, LTD., DBA MARIANAS RESORT AND SPA No. 10-1472 p c

  • Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    Publication Date: 2002-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-13
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Souter*fn1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 00-511, 00-

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuitThese cases arise under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Each is about the power of the

  • Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-17
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 12-416

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6152 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner v. ACTAVIS, INC., ET

  • Bilski v. Kappos

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-964

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 7966 BERNARD L. BILSKI and RAND A. WARSAW, PETITIONERS v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SE

  • Bilski v. Kappos

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-964

    BERNARD L. BILSKI and RAND A. WARSAW, PETITIONERS v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

  • Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

    Publication Date: 2013-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-27
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-864

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3396COMCAST CORPORATION, , PETITIONERSv.CAROLINE BEHREND