Filter This View

  • Olson v. Major League Baseball

    Publication Date: 2022-03-29
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Joseph Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees: Steven L. Bloch, on the brief, David S. Golub, John D. Radice, Kenneth Pickle, Natasha Fernandez-Silber, April Lambert, Radice Law Firm, P.C., Princeton, New Jersey, on the brief, Silver Golub & Teitell LLP, Stamford, Connecticut.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants: Benjamin R. Walker, Hannah Lonky Fackler, on the brief, John L. Hardiman, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, New York. For Interested Party-Appellee-Cross-Appellant: on the brief, Randy L. Levine, New York Yankees Partnership, Bronx, New York; Jonathan D. Schiller, Thomas H. Sosnowski, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, New York.. For Defendant-Appellee Boston Red Sox Baseball Club, L.P.: Katherine B. Forrest, Michael T. Reynolds, Lauren A. Moskowitz, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, New York. For Defendant-Appellee Houston Astros, LLC: Clifford Thau, Marisa Antos-Fallon, on the brief, Hilary L. Preston, Michael C. Holmes, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, Texas, on the brief, Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, New York.
    Case Number: 20-1831-cv

    Fantasy Sports Players' Fraud Claims Dismissed Against MLB Defendants

  • Cases decided on: December 5, 2017

    Publication Date: 2017-12-07
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Docket

    Appellate Division, First Department: December 5, 2017

  • Lambert v. Nutraceutical Corp.

    Publication Date: 2017-09-18
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Class Actions | Food and Drug Act
    Industry: Consumer Products
    Date Filed: 2017-09-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory Weston (argued) and David Elliott, The Weston Firm, San Diego, California; Ronald A. Marron, The Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron APLC, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Steven N. Feldman (argued) and John C. Hueston, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jon F. Monroy, Monroy Averbuck & Gysler, West Lake Village, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 15-56423

    Filing of motion for reconsideration tolled 14-day deadline for seeking interlocutory appeal of order decertifying class (Paez, J.)

  • Meyer v. Uber Technologies, 16-2750-cv

    Publication Date: 2017-08-21
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection | Class Actions | Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Chin, and Carney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Spencer Meyer: Brian Marc Feldman, Edwin Michael Larkin, III, Gregory M. Dickinson, on the brief, Jeffrey A. Wadsworth, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Rochester, New York, and Bryan L. Clobes, Ellen Meriwether, Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Matthew L. Cantor, Ankur Kapoor, Constantine Cannon LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc.: Daniel G. Swanson, Cynthia E. Richman, Joshua S. Lipshutz, Reed Brodsky, on the brief, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, California, Washington, D.C., and New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Travis Kalanick: Karen L. Dunn, William A. Isaacson, Ryan Y. Park, Peter M. Skinner, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Washington, D.C. and New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Public Justice, P.C.: Jonathan D. Selbin, Jason L. Lichtman, Lieff Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, New York, New York, and Jahan Sagafi, Paul W. Mollica, Outten & Golden LLP, San Francisco, California and Chicago, Illinois. For Amici Curiae Law Professors: Alexander H. Schmidt, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Internet Association and Consumer Technology Association: Rees F. Morgan, Mark L. Hejinian, Skye D. Langs, Coblentz Patch Duffy and Bass LLP, San Francisco, California. For Amicus Curiae The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America: Kate Comerford Todd, Warren Postman, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, D.C., and Andrew J. Pincus, Evan M. Tager, Archis A. Parasharami, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 16-2750-cv

    Appeals Court Finds for Uber, Says App Made Service Terms

  • Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2016-09-07
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Transportation
    Industry: Transportation
    Date Filed: 2016-09-07
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard C. Tallman, Richard R. Clifton, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Ho (argued), Andrew P. Lee, and William Jhaveri-Weeks, Goldstein Borgen Dardarian & Ho, Oakland, California; Robert Ahdoot, Tina Wolfson, and Theodore Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, West Hollywood, California; Meredith Desautels and Dana Isaac Quinn, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, San Francisco, California; Monique Olivier, Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier LLP, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    for defendant: Theodore Boutrous, Jr. (argued) and Theane D. Evangelis, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, California; Joshua S. Lipshutz and Kevin J. Ring-Dowell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, California; Rod M. Fliegel, Littler Mendelson P.C., San Francisco, California; Andrew M. Spurchise, Littler Mendelson P.C., New York, New York; for Defendants-Appellants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC.
    Case Number: No. 15-16178 No. 15-16181 No. 15-16250

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 9892 ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appel

  • In re: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2014-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-06-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: A. Wallace Tashima, William A. Fletcher, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert Hager and Treva Hearne (argued), Hager & Hearne, Reno, Nevada; William A. Nebeker, Valerie R. Edwards (argued), and Lisa Irene Streu, Koeller Nebeker Carlson & Haluck, LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; and Sheryl Serreze, Reno Law Group, LLC, Reno, Nevada, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Andrew Martin Jacobs, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Tucson, Arizona; Andrew R. Louis, Buckley Sandler, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Cynthia Lynn Alexander and Kelly Harrison Dove, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Las Vegas, Nevada;
    Case Number: No. 11-17615

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6439 IN RE: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., JONATHAN E. ROBINSON; SALLY J. ROBINSO

  • Streit v. Covington & Crowe

    Publication Date: 2000-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-20
    Court: Cal. Ct. App.
    Judge: GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-50181

    GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:Plaintiff-appellant Eva Vielma (Vielma) brought this action against her employer, defendant-appellee Eureka Company (Eureka), alleging Texas law claimsof age and disabilit

  • Mez Indus. v. Pacific Nat'l Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 1999-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-03
    Court: The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate
    Judge: CROSKEY, KLEIN, and KITCHING
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gauntlett & Associates for Plaintiff and Appellant
    for defendant: Edmund G. Farrell at al., for Defendant and Respondent
    Case Number: No. B121209

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case presents the question of whether a liability insurer providing coverage for "advertising injury" i

  • Kilgore v. Keybank, National Association

    Publication Date: 2013-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-04-11
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Thelton E. Henderson, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, Richard C. Tallman, Consuelo M. Callahan, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mary H. Murguia, Morgan Christen, Paul J. Watford, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew A. August and Kevin F. Rooney, Pinnacle Law Group, LLP; James C. Sturdevant (argued) and Whitney Huston, The Sturdevant Law Firm, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Appellants. David Horton, Davis, California; Hiro N. Aragaki, Los Angeles, California, for Amici Curiae Law Professors. Hiro N. Aragaki and David Doeling, Los Angeles, California, for Amici Curiae Arbitration Professors. Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, California; Andrew J. Pincus (argued), Evan M. Tager, Archis A. Parasharami, and Scott M. Noveck, Mayer Brown LLP; Robin S. Conrad and Kate Comerford Todd, National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. Steve Bullock and Kelley L. Hubbard, Office of the Montana Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for Amicus Curiae State of Montana. Arthur D. Levy; Nancy Barron, Kemnitzer, Barron & Krieg LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae The National Association of Consumer Advocates and The National Consumer Law Center. Ellen Lake, Oakland, California; Terisa E. Chaw, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy; Rebecca M. Hamburg, National Employment Lawyers Association; Cliff Palefsky, McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, San Francisco, California, for Amici Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association, The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute for Law & Policy, and California Employment Lawyers Association. Mark A. Chavez, Chavez & Gertler LLP, Mill Valley, California, for Amicus Curiae The National Consumer Law Center, National Association of Consumer Advocates, Public Citizen and National Consumers League.
    for defendant: W. Scott O'Connell (argued), Courtney Q. Brooks, and Kristen M. Yasenka, Nixon Peabody LLP, Manchester, New Hampshire; Matthew A. Richard, Todd C. Toral, and Stephanie Karnavas, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellants/Appellees. C. Dawn Causey and Gregory F. Taylor, American Bankers Association, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae American Bankers Association, Consumer Bankers Association, and the Clearing House Association, L.L.C.
    Case Number: No. 09-16703 No. 10-15934

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3923MATTHEW C. KILGORE, individually and on beha all others similarly situated; WILLIAM BRUCE FULLER, individually and on beha

  • Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Kelly M. Klaus, Aimee Feinberg and Mark Yohalem, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California; and John B. Quinn, Susan R. Estrich, Michael T. Zeller and B. Dylan Proctor, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellee. Simon J. Frankel, Margaret D. Wilkinson and Steven D. Sassaman, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California; Steven M. Freeman and Steven C. Sheinberg, Anti-Defamation League, New York, New York; and Michelle N. Deutchman, Anti-Defamation League, Los Angeles, California, for amici Anti-Defamation League et al.
    for defendant: E. Joshua Rosenkranz (argued) and Lisa T. Simpson, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York; Annette L. Hurst and Warrington S. Parker III, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; and Thomas J. Nolan and Jason D. Russell, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants.
    Case Number: No. 09-55673

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9316MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimantAppellee, v.MGA ENTERTAI