Filter This View

  • Cases decided on: December 5, 2017

    Publication Date: 2017-12-07
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Docket

    Appellate Division, First Department: December 5, 2017

  • Sales v. Sessions

    Publication Date: 2017-08-18
    Practice Area: Immigration Law | Criminal Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Date Filed: 2017-08-18
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Jon P. McCalla,*District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Harry J. Moren (argued), Alexander K. Talarides, and James N. Kramer, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner.
    for defendant: Jesse L. Busen (argued), Trial Attorney; Eric W. Marsteller and Claire L. Workman, Senior Litigation Counsel; Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent.
    Case Number: No. 15-70885

    California murder conviction based on aiding and abetting qualified as aggravated felony for removal purposes (Schroeder, J.)

  • June 13, 2017 |

    Castro v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Castro v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaJune…

    1 minute read

  • Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2016-08-23
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Contractual Disputes
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-08-23
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding Before: Stephen S. Trott, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy Robinson (argued), Jason C. Evans, and Gayle M. Blatt; Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield, LLP, San Diego, California; Mark Ankcorn, Ankcorn Law Firm, PC, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Robert P. Varian (argued), James N. Kramer, M. Todd Scott, and Alexander K Talarides; Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 14-16405

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 9197 DAVID TOMPKINS, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, p class="cas

  • In re: Thelen LLP, 12-4138-bk

    Publication Date: 2013-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Lynch, Chin, and Carney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Howard P. Magaliff, Rich Michaelson Magaliff Moser, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: M. Ryan Pinkston, Chicago, Illinois, and Robert W. Dremluk, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, New York, New York, on the brief, Thomas Feher, Thompson Hine LLP, Cleveland, Ohio. For Amicus Curiae in support of Defendant-Appellee: David A. Lewis, on the brief, Damian Schaible the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 12-4138-bk

    Cite as: In re: Thelen, 12-4138-bk, NYLJ 1202628467246, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 15, 2013) 12-4138-bk Before: Lynch, Chin, and Carney,

  • Greenfield v. Fritz Companies, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-28
    Court: Cal. Ct. App.
    Judge: POCHI, J., HANLON, P.J., and SEPULVEDA, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Braun and Marc L. Godino
    for defendant: William F. Alderman
    Case Number: No. A086982

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. This appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a general demurrer without leave t

  • Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court

    Publication Date: 1999-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-03
    Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
    Judge: THAXTER, HARRIS, and BUCKLEY
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel E. Alberti et al., for Petitioner
    for defendant: Maxwell M. Blecher et al., for Real Party in Interest
    Case Number: No. F033305

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The doctrine of unclean hands does not deny relief to a plaintiff guilty of any past misconduct; only misco

  • Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Kelly M. Klaus, Aimee Feinberg and Mark Yohalem, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California; and John B. Quinn, Susan R. Estrich, Michael T. Zeller and B. Dylan Proctor, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellee. Simon J. Frankel, Margaret D. Wilkinson and Steven D. Sassaman, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California; Steven M. Freeman and Steven C. Sheinberg, Anti-Defamation League, New York, New York; and Michelle N. Deutchman, Anti-Defamation League, Los Angeles, California, for amici Anti-Defamation League et al.
    for defendant: E. Joshua Rosenkranz (argued) and Lisa T. Simpson, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York; Annette L. Hurst and Warrington S. Parker III, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; and Thomas J. Nolan and Jason D. Russell, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants.
    Case Number: No. 09-55673

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9316MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimantAppellee, v.MGA ENTERTAI

  • Brooks v. City of San Mateo

    Publication Date: 2000-06-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-05
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: WOOD, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Prentice and Sheila A. Reid
    for defendant: Nancy E. Pritikin, et. al.
    Case Number: No. 98-15818

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. We consider the legal implications of a single, rather unsavory, episode of workplace sexual harassment.

  • Brooks v. City of San Mateo

    Publication Date: 2000-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-23
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: WOOD, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Prentice and Sheila A. Reid
    for defendant: Nancy E. Pritikin et al.
    Case Number: No. 98-15818

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. ORDER The opinion filed June 5, 2000, and reported at 214 F.3d 1082, is withdrawn and superseded by the attached o