Filter This View

  • August 18, 2016 | New York Law Journal

    Pushback Against Expanding Use of Non-Competes

    Concern has been expressed recently about the increasing use of restrictive covenants that limit an employee's right to work for a competitor following the end of employment. As the U.S.

    1 minute read

  • US v. William Lange, 14-2442-cr

    Publication Date: 2016-08-17
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | White Collar Crime | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Jacobs, Chin, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellant-Cross-Appellee: David C. James, Alixandra E. Smith, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief, Winston M. Paes, Assistant United States Attorney, for Robert L. Capers, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Richard D. Willstatter, Green & Willstatter, White Plains, NY. For Defendant-Appellant: James M. Branden, Law Office of James M. Branden, New York, NY
    Case Number: 14-2442-cr

    Cite as: US v. Lange, 14-2442-cr, NYLJ 1202765159802, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 15, 2016) CASE NAME United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v.

  • August 16, 2016 | The Legal Intelligencer

    The Perils of Attempting to Add a Plaintiff Midstream

    Many companies conduct ­business using several affiliates and ­subsidiaries at once. For example, one company may sign the contracts and provide project oversight, while emplo

    1 minute read

  • Babbitt v. State

    Publication Date: 2016-08-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Arianne Mathe' Collins Csider LLC, Gainesville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Christopher Quinn, Jon Setzer, Assistant District Attorneys, and Michael DiOrio District Attorney's Office, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A16A0338

    Although the trial court erred in allowing the State to use the defendant's pre-Miranda statement for impeachment purposes, the error was harmless in light of the other evidence of the defendant's

  • August 15, 2016 | New York Law Journal

    Big Firm/Small Firm—Size Matters for Attorney Disqualification

    When it comes to imputing conflicts of interest, size really does matter. This much is clear from two recent decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. At on

    1 minute read

  • August 10, 2016 |

    N.J. Supreme: Insurer Must Cover Claims That Subcontractor’s Negligence Damaged Insured Property

    The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that rain water damage allegedly caused by a subcontractor’s faulty workmanship constituted “property…

    1 minute read

  • August 10, 2016 |

    Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Adria Towers, L.L.C.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n, inc. v.Adria Towers, L.L.C.2016 WL 4131662Only the Westlaw citation…

    1 minute read

  • Gingery v. City of Glendale

    Publication Date: 2016-08-04
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-08-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Stephen Reinhardt, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman,* Senior District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald S. Barak (argued), Law Offices of Ronald S. Barak, Pacific Palisades, California; Maxwell M. Blecher, Donald R. Pepperman, and Taylor C. Wagniere, Blecher Collins Pepperman & Joye, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Christopher S. Munsey (argued) and Bradley H. Ellis, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California; Michael J. Garcia, Ann M. Maurer, and Andrew Rawcliffe, Glendale City Attorney's Office, Glendale, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 14-56440

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 8351 MICHIKO SHIOTA GINGERY, 
an individual; KOICHI MERA, an individual; GAHT-US CORPORATION, a California non-profit corporation,

  • People v. Jackson

    Publication Date: 2016-08-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-08-01
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette and Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Holly D. Wilkens and Tami Falkenstein Hennick, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Richard I. Targow, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S139103

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 8199 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BAILEY LAMAR JACKSON,

  • Yhudai v. Impac Funding Corporation

    Publication Date: 2016-08-01
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Date Filed: 2016-07-29
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard L. Antognini for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Reed Smith, Michael Gerst, Kasey J. Curtis, and Elena Gekker for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. B262509

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 8268 MOSHE YHUDAI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. IMPAC FUNDING CORPORA