Filter This View

  • January 9, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Two Major Blows Dealt to Veterans Seeking Benefits

    Veterans' organizations suffered two blows in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, when the justices denied review in lawsuits attempting to remedy extraordinary delays in the handling of benefi

    1 minute read

  • August 12, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    11th Circuit Oral Arguments Won't Be Online Soon

    In May, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals began putting audio recordings of oral arguments on its Web site. Next month, the 1st Circuit plans to join that court and four other federal courts of

    1 minute read

  • January 7, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Two major blows for veterans seeking benefits

    Veterans' organizations suffered two blows in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, when the justices denied review in lawsuits attempting to remedy extraordinary delays in the handling of benefi

    1 minute read

  • October 19, 2005 |

    Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP

    This firm practice profile was paid for and provided by the firm. For information

    1 minute read

  • June 16, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Weil Wins Ruling for Widows of Disabled Vets

    On Thursday, U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge George Miller granted summary judgment to the widows of three disabled veterans who sought the reinstatement of benefits that they alleged had been wron

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Bankruptcy Practice

    In Trenwick America Litig. Trust v. Ernst & Young, LLP, a Delaware state court recently

    1 minute read

  • Coito v. Superior Court (State of California)

    Publication Date: 2012-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-25
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinksi, Okimoto, Stucky, Ukshini, Markowitz & Carcione, Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Gary W. Dolinski and Neal A. Markowitz for Petitioner. Rose, Klein & Marias and David A. Rosen for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. Schiavenza, Assistant Attorney General, Steven M. Gevercer and Peter A. Meshot, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest. O?Melveney & Myers, Paul Salvaty and Michael Reynolds for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, (San Francisco) and Danny Chou, Chief of Complex and Special Ligation, for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.
    Case Number: No. S181712

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7149 DEBRA COITO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY, Respon

  • April 7, 2008 | National Law Journal

    The 2008 APPELLATE HOT LIST

    Our first annual Appellate Hot List is our unscientific survey of firms that scored at least one sign t appellate win since January 2007, plus an impressive track record overall. A "sign

    1 minute read

  • April 26, 2004 | The Recorder

    Singin' the Legal Blues

    When pop singer Michael Bolton feels betrayed, he does more than croon a sad song. He also goes to court. At the moment, he's suing Weil, Gotshal & Manges for $30 million in damages, alleg

    1 minute read

  • April 20, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Ross, plaintiffs-respondents-appellants v. Louise Wise Services Inc., defendant-appellant-respondent

    Decided April 13, 2006Before Tom, J.P.; Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli, and Sweeny, JJ. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered May 20, 2004, which denied

    1 minute read