Filter This View

  • Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California

    Publication Date: 2012-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Browne George Ross, Brown Woods George, Allan Browne, Eric M. George, Benjamin D. Scheibe, Ira Bibbero; Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Elizabeth G. Chilton and Andrew Baum for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, Kathleen M. Sullivan, Daniel H. Bromberg, John B. Quinn, Michael E. Williams and Michael T. Lifrak for Defendants and Appellants. Cole Pedroza, Curtis A. Cole and Cassidy E. Cole for California Medical Association, California Hospital Association and California Dental Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Daniel J. Popeo, Richard A. Samp; Bergeson and Mark E. Foster for Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Mayer Brown and Donald M. Falk for Actelion Pharmaceuticals U.S. as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Ada Meloy; Hogan Lovells US, Michael Shepard, Martin Michaelson, Alexander Dreier and David Ginn for American Council on Education and other Higher Education Associations and Institutions as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Thomas M. Peterson and Benjamin P. Smith for Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.
    Case Number: No. S191550

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12935SARGON ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant,v.UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIF

  • July 23, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Mayer Brown Facing Lawsuit For $17 Million

    As Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw readies for potential claims arising out of its representation of failed commodities brokerage Refco, the Chicago law firm's work for another bankrupt company h

    1 minute read

  • August 16, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Mayer Brown Helps AT&T Strike Down Another Consumer Class Action

    The post-AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion legal landscape has been confusing, to say the least. While most experts believed that the April decision by the Supreme Court upholding mandator

    1 minute read

  • September 10, 2007 | Legal Times

    Keeping Score

    Taking a StanceFirst there was the wide stance. Then the phone call. Now comes the lawyering up. Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) is apparently having second thoughts

    1 minute read

  • April 5, 2010 | National Law Journal

    2010 APPELLATE HOT LIST

    AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD Twenty-four victories in 2009 are emblematic of the firm's stature in appellate law. Its success lies in its coupling of long-est

    1 minute read

  • April 21, 2003 | Legal Times

    Docket Watch: April 2003

    Below are cases before the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and the lawyers who will argue them. "Docket Watch" appears at the beginning of each two-week argument cycle when the high

    1 minute read

  • January 27, 2006 | National Law Journal

    High Court's Business Docket Overflows

    WASHINGTON � In just the last three months, the business community's stakes in the current U.S. Supreme Court term have skyrocketed with the addition of cases raising vital issues in a broad s

    1 minute read

  • September 20, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Fogel Compels Arbitration in 2007 Suit Against AT&T Mobility

    Mayer Brown's April U.S. Supreme Court win for AT&T in AT&T Wireless v. Concepcion is turning out to be the gift that keeps on giving for the telecom giant and it lawyers. After the

    1 minute read

  • November 19, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    Ex-Mayer Brown Partner Convicted at Retrial

    Former Mayer Brown partner Joseph Collins was convicted on Nov. 16 of helping top executives at Refco conceal a $2.4 billion fraud from investors and purchasers of the financial services

    1 minute read

  • August 18, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    2nd Circuit Seeks N.Y. High Court's Guidance on Important Business Issues

    The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has asked New York's highest court to resolve two unsettled questions of New York law it says are important to the business and financial communities.

    1 minute read