Filter This View

  • Talley v. City of Killeen

    Publication Date: 2013-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-11-20
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Scott K. Field, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-09-00736-CV

    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 235, 917-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDG

  • Kivo v. Blumberg Exelsior, 13-CV-4170

    Publication Date: 2013-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiff by: Abraham Kleinman, Esq., of Counsel, Kleinman, LLC, Uniondale, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for the Plaintiff by: Cathleen, M. Combs, Esq., Tiffany N. Hardy, Esq., of Counsel, Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC, Chicago, IL. Attorneys for the Defendant Blumberg Excelsior, Inc by: Andrew N. Krinsky, Esq. Maxwell D. Rosenthall, Esq., of Counsel, Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys for the Defendant Blumberg Excelsior, Inc. by: Alan R. Arkin, Esq., of Counsel, Arkin Kaplan Rice LLP, New York, NY. NO APPEARANCES: Does 1-10
    Case Number: 13-CV-4170

    Cite as: Kivo v. Blumberg Exelsior, 13-CV-4170, NYLJ 1202630345260, at *1 (EDNY, Decided November 16, 2013) 13-CV-4170 District Judge Arthur D. S

  • December 5, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Apple Fights Broad Reach of Court Appointed Monitor

    Apple Inc. and its defense lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher are once again butting heads with Southern District Judge Denise Cote (a href="http://judges.newyorklawjournal.com/profile/

    1 minute read

  • December 2, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Apple Takes Aim at Monitor in E-Books Case

    Apple Inc. and its defense lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher are once again butting heads with Denise Cote, the U.S. district court judge in Manhattan who ruled that the company fixed e

    1 minute read

  • Hayes v. County of San Diego

    Publication Date: 2013-12-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-02
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and Algenon L. Marbley, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alvin M. Gomez, The Gomez Law Group, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Morris G. Hill, Senior Deputy, and John J. Sansone, County Counsel, County of San Diego, San Diego, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 09-55644

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 12959 CHELSEY HAYES, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Plaintiff-Appellant, v

  • December 1, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    Patently New

    New procedures for challenging patents that were instituted last year under the America Invents Act are creating a shift in the way companies and their attorneys treat intellectual prop

    1 minute read

  • December 1, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    Verizon Vodafone Verizon Communications Inc. agreed to pay Vodafone Group plc $130 billion on September 2 to take full control

    1 minute read

  • Mondragon v. Capital One Auto Finance

    Publication Date: 2013-11-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Before: GOODWIN, FISHER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher P. Barry (argued) and Lacee B. Smith, Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Hunter R. Eley (argued), William H. Edmonson, and Johari N. Townes, Doll Amir & Eley LLP, Los Angeles, California; David N. Anthony, Alan D. Wingfield, and Nicholas R. Klaiber, Troutman Sanders LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Defendant­-Appellant.
    Case Number: No. 13-56699

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 12809 JOSE MONDRAGON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appe

  • November 26, 2013 | Delaware Business Court Insider

    Chancery Ct.: Attorney-Client Privilege Is Corporate Asset

    An acquired company's attorney-client privilege is an asset that belongs to the post-merger entity, the Delaware Court of Chancery has ruled. The court issued the opinion when it denied

    1 minute read

  • November 26, 2013 |

    Chicago Ins. Co. v. City of Council Bluffs

     Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Chicago Ins. Co.v.City of Council Bluffs713 F.3d 963United States Court of Appeals,Eighth…

    1 minute read