Filter This View

  • February 18, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Boisterous Hearing on Google Book Deal Ends with Sharp Questions, But No Ruling, from Judge Denny Chin

    The most powerful Internet search company in the world was outnumbered Thursday morning in Manhattan federal district court. For nearly four hours, objectors to a sweeping class action settlement that

    1 minute read

  • March 1, 2010 | National Law Journal

    D.C. Calendar of Events

    Wednesday, March 3 HEALTH LAW: The District of Columbia Bar's Health Law Section presents "Prac­ticing Health Law in the Health Reform Era: A P

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2005 |

    A Lesson in Law Firm Darwinism: Adapt or Die

    Intellectual property law firms have been living inside a paradox for the past decade: While the IP practice booms, IP boutiques face a constant threat of extinction. The pressure hasn't let u

    1 minute read

  • Demers v. Austin

    Publication Date: 2013-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Robert H. Whaley, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: William A. Fletcher and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and Gordon J. Quist, Senior District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Judith A. Endejan (argued), Graham & Dunn, PC, Seattle, Washington, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Kathryn M. Battuello (argued) and Catherine Hendricks, Office of the Washington Attorney General, Seattle, Washington, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 11-35558

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 9848 DAVID K. DEMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERICA AUSTIN; ERICH LE

  • September 5, 2012 | Litigation Daily

    Second Circuit Revives Louboutin's Red Sole Mark, but with Scuffs

    Being neither trademark lawyers nor particularly fashion-forward, we hadn't ever considered the merits of single-color trademarks for clothing until last year, when a new line of monochromati

    1 minute read

  • December 11, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Ex-State Development Chief To Join Rivkin Radler The former chief of the state's economic development agency will join Rivkin Radler, Long Island's largest

    1 minute read

  • January 5, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    News In Brief

    Evidence of Media Reports Barred From Trial on Bonuses Bank of America will not be able to call experts to testify about 2008 media reports on the likelihood that soon-

    1 minute read

  • November 1, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Supreme Court Grants Stanford's Cert Petition in Fight over Federally-Funded Inventions

    It's never clear how much the government's support of a certiorari petition to the U.S. Supreme Court helps. But it sure didn't hurt Stanford University in its patent dispute with the Swiss drug giant

    1 minute read

  • US v. Robert Coplan, 10-583-cr(L)

    Publication Date: 2012-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Kearse, McLaughlin, and Cabranes, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: Richard C. Tarlowe, Assistant United States Attorney, (Mark Lanpher, Andrea L. Surratt, and Katherine Polk Failla, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Robert Coplan: Dennis P. Riordan, (Donald M. Horgan and Gary Dubcoff, on the brief), Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA; Ted Sampsell Jones, William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, MN. For Defendant-Appellant Martin Nissenbaum: Nathan Lewin, (Alyza D. Lewin, on the brief), Lewin & Lewin, LLP, Washington, DC. Of counsel; For Defendant-Appellant Richard Shapiro: Alexandra A.E. Shapiro, (Marc E. Isserles and James Darrow, on the brief), Macht, Shapiro, Arato & Isserles LLP, New York, NY; Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Brian Vaughn: Robert G. Anderson, (Donna Brown Jacobs, on the brief) Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC, Ridgeland, MS. For Defendant-Appellant Charles Bolton: Marc N. Garber, The Garber Law Firm, P.C., Marietta, GA. For amicus curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; in support of Defendants-Appellants: Joshua L. Dratel, Joshua L. Dratel, P.C., New York, NY, for amicus curiae New York Council of Defense Lawyers; Laura Grossfield Birger and Rachel B. Kane, Cooley LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 10-583-cr(L)

    Cite as: US v. Robert Coplan, 10-583-cr(L), NYLJ 1202579883765, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 29, 2012)Before: Kearse, McLaughlin, and Cabranes, C

  • May 18, 2012 | Litigation Daily

    Skadden Leads Effort To Invalidate California Artists' Royalties Law

    World renowned auction houses Sotheby's and Christie's enjoy an intense and longstanding rivalry. However, the two recently put aside their differences to team up and argue that a California sta

    1 minute read