• October 5, 2017 | Delaware Law Weekly

    Praluent Sales to Resume as Sanofi, Regeneron Win New Infringement Trial

    A federal appeals court on Thursday ordered a new trial in a high-profile patent infringement dispute over Sanofi's drug Praluent and lifted a permanent injunction barring sales of the biologic, used to fight high cholesterol.

    1 minute read

  • Eren v. Gulluoglu, 15-CV-4083

    Publication Date: 2017-10-05
    Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation | Employment Litigation
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Dora Irizarry
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 15-CV-4083

    Baklava Chefs' Jobs Not 'Creative' Under FLSA, Judge

  • Moore v. Navillus Tile, Inc., 14 Civ. 8326

    Publication Date: 2017-10-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Colleen McMahon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14 Civ. 8326

    Waiver of Rule 62(d) Supersedeas Bond Requirement for Judgment's Appeal De

  • October 4, 2017 | Litigation Daily

    How the Largest FCA Judgment in History Fell Apart (Hint: Gibson Dunn)

    In a sweet win for lead counsel James Ho, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher who was nominated last week by President Donald Trump for a seat on the Fifth Circuit, highway guardrail maker Trinity Industries dodged a $682 million bullet. What happened?

    1 minute read

  • October 4, 2017 | The Recorder

    Problematic Ruling on Appellate Stays for Disqualification Orders Needs Immediate Attention

    Sometimes an appellate court follows the law and maintains appropriate deference to the Legislature and higher courts, but in doing so issues a ruling that creates extraordinary practical policy problems. The Fourth District Court of Appeal's ruling last week in 'URS Corp.', involving stays that result from appeals of disqualification orders, is such a case.

    1 minute read

  • Dubin v. The County of Nassau, 16-CV-4209

    Publication Date: 2017-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiffs are represented by Kevin Page, Kiel Martin Doran, and Steven M. O'Connor of O'Connor Reed, LLP, Port Chester, New York.
    for defendant: Defendants are represented by Andrew Reginald Scott of the Nassau County Attorney's Office, Mineola, New York.

    Case Number: 16-CV-4209

    Excessive Fines Challenge to County's 'Drivers Responsibility Fee' May P

  • Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, 15-1872-cv

    Publication Date: 2017-10-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Securities Litigation | Litigators
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Wesley, Livingston, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Philippe Z. Selendy, Adam M. Abensohn, William B. Adams, Andrew R. Dunlap, Yelena Konanova, on the brief, Kathleen M. Sullivan, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellants Nomura Holding America, Inc., Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., David Findlay, John McCarthy, John P. Graham, Nathan Gorin, and N. Dante LaRocca: Amanda F. Davidoff, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, D.C.; Bruce E. Clark, Steven L. Holley, Adam R. Brebner, Owen R. Wolfe, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, David B. Tulchin, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant RBS Securities, Inc.: Thomas C. Rice, Andrew T. Frankel, Alan C. Turner, Craig S. Waldman, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY; Paul F. Rugani, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Seattle, WA; Daniel A. Rubens, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY; Kelsi Brown Corkran, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, D.C., on the brief, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and The Clearing House Association LLC, in support of defendants-appellants: Michael J. Dell, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 15-1872-cv(L)

    Second Circuit Affirms Judgment in Fed Suit Over Housing Crisis-Era Secu

  • September 29, 2017 | National Law Journal

    DC Circuit Vacates Brokers SEC Punishments, But Not Liability

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the SEC's finding that a broker violated securities laws, but remanded the case to the agency for reconsideration of the penalties.

    1 minute read

  • September 28, 2017 | The Recorder

    Levi v. The Regents of the University of California

    C.A. 4th; D069526 The Fourth Appellate District reversed in part a judgment. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that a former state…

    1 minute read

  • Matter of Avaya Inc., 17-10089

    Publication Date: 2017-09-25
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District
    Judge: Bankruptcy Judge Stuart Bernstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Marlene Clark: Jeffrey Chubak, Esq. of Counsel, Storch Amini PC, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Counsel for the Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession: James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C., Esq., Jonathan S. Henes, P.C., Esq., Patrick J. Nash, Jr., P.C., Esq., Ryan Preston Dahl, Esq., Bradley Thomas Giordano, Esq., of Counsel, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY. Counsel to the Ad Hoc First Lien Group: Ira S. Dizengoff, Esq., Philip C. Dublin, Esq., Abid Qureshi, Esq., of Counsel, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, NY. Counsel to the Ad Hoc Crossover Group: Kristopher M. Hansen, Esq., Sayan Bhattacharyya, Esq., Gabriel E. Sasson, Esq., of Counsel, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., Todd M. Goren, Esq., of Counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 17-10089

    Pension to Surviving Wife Is 'Survivor Benefit' Not 'Retiree Benefit' Under Code §1114(a)