Filter This View

  • September 7, 2010 | National Law Journal

    11th Circuit upholds Florida's school travel ban

    The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a Florida law prohibiting universities from using state funds to pay for faculty traveling to countries designated by the federal government

    1 minute read

  • Martinez v. Regents of University of California

    Publication Date: 2010-11-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-15
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Immigration Reform Law Institute, Kris W. Kobach; Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley and Michael J. Brady for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Lawrence J. Joseph for Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Daniel J. Popeo, Richard A. Stamp; Law Offices of Mark E. Foster and Mark E. Foster for U.S. Representative Lamar Smith, U.S. Representative Steve King, Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Sharon L. Browne and Ralph W. Kasarda for Pacific Legal Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Charles F. Robinson, Christopher M. Patti, Margaret L. Wu; Howard Rice Nemervoski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Robert D. Hallman; Folger Levin & Kahn, Crowell & Moring, Ethan P. Schulman and Trina D. McAlister for Defendants and Respondents The Regents of the University of California and Mark G. Yudof. Christine Helwick and Andrea M. Gunn for Defendants and Respondents Board of Trustees of the California State University and Charles B. Reed. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, David S. Chaney, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, and Julie Weng-Gutierrez, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents California Community Colleges and Chancellor Marshall Drummond. Multicultural Education, Training and Advocacy (META) Inc., and Peter D. Roos for Californians Together, The Association of Mexican American Educators and the California Association of Bilingual Education as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Julie A. Su, Yungsuhn Park, Carmina Ocampo; Bird, Marella, Boxer, Woolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Paul S. Chan and Jennifer S. Chang for Asian Pacific American Legal Center and 80 Asian Pacific American organizations as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S167791

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14298ROBERT MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

  • August 31, 2009 | National Law Journal

    $118 million settlement in Broadcom stock options backdating case

    Insurance companies for Broadcom Co. have agreed to pay $118 million to settle allegations of stock options backdating, in one of the largest such deals in a derivative action to d

    1 minute read

  • Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    Publication Date: 2012-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Thomas R. Freeman, Paul S. Chan; Dakessian Law Firm, Akerman Senterfitt, Reed Smith, Mardiros H. Dakessian; The California Credits Group, LaShelle T. Wilson and Mark Danscecs for Plaintiff and Appellant. Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Krista M. Enns and Linda T. Coberly for California Taxpayers? Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Silverstein & Pomerantz, Amy L. Silverstein and Edwin P. Antolin for Deluxe Corp. as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Gordon Burns, State Deputy Solicitor General, Paul D. Gifford and Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorneys General, W. Dean Freeman, Felix E. Leatherwood, Mark P. Richelson and Ronald N. Ito, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. S173860

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4569 DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendan

  • February 24, 2010 | The Recorder

    9th Circuit OKs Privacy Suit Over Disclosure of HIV Status

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has given a San Francisco man another chance to pursue a case for damages against the government after information on his HIV status was shared among several f

    1 minute read

  • July 9, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Netflix Dispute Over Attorney Fees Draws Tech Support

    Netflix's bid for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to hold an en banc hearing on the legal standard for district court awards of attorney fees in patent cases is generating a groun

    1 minute read

  • March 31, 2003 | Legal Times

    Honors and Appointments

    COMMERCIAL FINANCE LAWYERIn recognition of her long-term commitment to the practice of commercial finance law, Lynn Soukup has been elected a fellow of the American

    1 minute read

  • June 17, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    Former AG candidate makes a bid for Ga. appellate court seat

    A former Republican candidate for attorney general announced he will run for the Georgia Court of Appeals. Perry J. McGuire, an attorney at Taylor, Busch, Slipakoff & Duma, is seek

    1 minute read

  • January 28, 2003 | Daily Report Online

    High Court OKs Search Warrants for Medical Records

    Jonathan Ringel [email protected] Hospital patients do not have the right to be notified before authorities execute a criminal search warrant seeking the patients' medic

    1 minute read

  • September 28, 2009 | National Law Journal

    Justices to take up lawyer ethics, errors

    How lawyers do their jobs — from the type of advice they give clients to the calculation of fees — moves to the fore in the new U.S. Supreme Court term in six cases that could dra

    1 minute read