Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
7,822 results for 'Akin//////////////////////////// court:"Court of Appeals"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-07-20
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-07-06
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth
Judge: KEVIN JEWELL, JUSTICE
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 14-16-00978-CV
Appellant, an economic development corporation organized under the Development Corporation Act of 1979, entered into a performance agreement with appellee, a nonprofit organization that promoted and
July 20, 2017 |
Click Here for FC&S Expert Legal AnalysisSotov. SaccoSupreme Court of ArizonaJuly 13, 2017, FiledNo. CV-16-0136-PR2017 Ariz. LEXIS 184 * MICHAEL…
1 minute read
July 19, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Bill Moran writes: The First Amendment details bedrock principles in the United States that counter the "right to be forgotten" movement proceeding in Europe and elsewhere. But a debate is needed over where to find the proper balance between our inherent privacy rights concerning at least some of our personal online data on the one hand, and the constitutional rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press on the other. A more focused approach might strike the balance and thereby advance a foundation for Internet privacy regulation.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2017-07-19
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Date Filed: 2017-06-29
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District
Judge: TERRIE LIVINGSTON, CHIEF JUSTICE
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 02-16-00153-CV
Erwin Lee Harvey petitioned the court to appoint a receiver to sell a plot of land. He owned seven-eights of the land and appellant Jay Wayne Carter, Jr. owned the remaining one-eighth. Harvey argue
Publication Date: 2017-07-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Winter, Jacobs, and Pooler, C.JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Pasternack: Jared R. Clark on the brief, Mark M. Elliott, Phillips Nizer LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiff-Appellant Reginald Boudinot: Michael Q. English, Finn Dixon & Herling LLP, Stamford, CT. For Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellants Reginald Boudinot and Paul Kocourek: Mark Kelly, Kelly & Hazen, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees: Everett C. Johnson, Jr., J. Christian Word, Sarah A. Greenfield, and Jonathan Y. Ellis on the brief, J. Scott Ballenger Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC.
Case Number: 16-217
ERISA Claims' Dismissal Upheld; Consultancy's Stock Rights Plan Not an Employee Pensio
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Date Filed: 2017-07-05
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Judge: MARIALYN BARNARD, JUSTICE
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 04-16-00063-CV
Appellant owned almost 2,000 contiguous acres of land in the Texas Hill Country; appellee represented residents of two subdivisions. The original owner previously signed and recorded a declaration w
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area: Telecommunications | Civil Appeals
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Acosta, P.J., Richter, Andrias, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, appellant-respondent/respondent: Thomas J. Hall of counsel, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, and Rachel W. Thorn, Alan Levine and Caroline Pignatelli of counsel, Cooley LLP, New York. For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Carter G. Phillips of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.
for defendant: For the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Benjamin R. Nagin, Eamon P. Joyce, Kwaku A. Akowuah and Tobias S. Loss-Eaton of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, New York. For Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC, respondent-appellant/respondent: Stephen R. Neuwirth, Sanford I. Weisburst, Julia J. Peck and Cleland B. Welton II of counsel, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York. For the Office of Commissioner of Baseball and the Commissioner of Major League Baseball, respondents-appellants: Paul Clement of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, Erin E. Murphy of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Virginia, admitted pro hac vice, and Michael H. McGinley of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, John J. Buckley, Jr. of counsel, Williams & Connolly, New York, and Jonathan D. Lupkin of counsel, Lupkin and Associates, New York. For E. Leo Milonas, amicus curiae: David G. Keyko of counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, New York. For Diamond Dealers Club, Inc., amicus curiae: Stephen L. Ascher, Irene M. Ten Cate and Jeremy H. Ershow of counsel, Jenner Block LLP, New York. For Kenneth R. Feinberg, amicus curiae: Lawrence I. Ginsburg, Jay R. Fialkoff and Robert B. McFarlane of counsel, Moses & Singer LLP, New York. For Robert S. Smith, amicus curiae: Robert S. Smith, Robert J. Lack and Nora Bojar of counsel, Friedman Kaplan Seiler and Adelman, New York.
Case Number: 652044/14
Panel's Close Call on MLB-Network Dispute May Set Up Extra Legal I
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Joseph Bianco
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented by: Darren T. Kaplan of Darren Kaplan Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY. Jeffrey Ostrow of Kopelowitz Ostrow P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Hassan Zavareei and Jeffrey D. Kaliel of Tycko & Zavareei LLP, Washington, DC., and John A. Moore, Norman Siegel, and Stephen N. Six of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Kansas City, Missouri.
for defendant: Defendant is represented by: Barry Werbin of Herrick, Feinstein LLP, New York, NY., and John C. Elkman, Bryan Freeman, and James P. McCarthy of Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Case Number: 13-CV-5438
RICO, GBL Claims Against Bank Over 'Payday' Loan Dismissed; Enrichment Claim Su
Publication Date: 2017-07-17
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Civil Rights
Industry: Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Date Filed: 2017-07-17
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew Crocker (argued), Nathan Cardozo, Lee Tien, Kurt Opsahl, Jennifer Lynch, David Greene, Cindy Cohn, and Aaron Mackey, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California; Richard Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, California; for Petitioner-Appellants.
for defendant: Lewis S. Yelin (argued), Scott R. McIntosh, and Douglas N. Letter, Appellate Staff; Brian Stretch, United States Attorney; Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 16-16067 No. 16-16081 No. 16-16082
Law authorizing imposition of nondisclosure requirement on recipient of national security letter does not violate First Amendment (Ikuta, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-07-17
Practice Area: White Collar Crime
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Cabranes, Wesley, C.JJ., and Sessions, J.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: Howard S. Master, James McDonald, Karl Metzner, on the brief, Andrew D. Goldstein, for Joon H. Kim, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant‐Appellant: Robert K. Kry, Justin V. Shur, MoloLamken LLP, Joel Cohen, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP, on the brief, Steven F. Molo, MoloLamken LLP, New York, NY.
Case Number: 16-1615-cr
Silver Corruption Conviction Overturned by Second C
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
