• Fulle v. Kanani

    Publication Date: 2017-02-01
    Practice Area: Personal Injury | Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Date Filed: 2017-01-31
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Office of Dennis Ardi, Dennis Ardi; Garfield & Tepper and Scott J. Tepper, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Nelson Griffin, Edwin C. Mann, Raymond J. Muro; Law Offices of Cleidin Z. Atanous and Cleidin Z. Atanous, for Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. B271240

    Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 949 JEANETTE E. FULLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KAVEH M. KANANI, Def

  • Aguilar v. Morales, 08-15-00098-CV (TexApp Dist 01/18/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-02-01
    Practice Area: Wrongful Death
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-01-18
    Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District
    Judge: ANN CRAWFORD MCCLURE, CHIEF JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-15-00098-CV

    Appeal from 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas(TC # 2013DCV3131)Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.Hughes, J

  • February 1, 2017 | The American Lawyer

    Jenner Elevates Three to Fill Gap at Top of Appellate Group

    Jenner & Block's well-known appellate group has looked much like a question mark for the past few months—until that question was answered Monday. Obama-era Solicitor G

    1 minute read

  • Jerry Hartfield v. State of Texas, 13-15-00428-CR (TexApp Dist 01/19/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-01-19
    Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth
    Judge: GINA M. BENAVIDES JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 13-15-00428-CR

    On appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas. Before Ju

  • January 31, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Post-'Spokeo' Standing for Consumer Class Actions a Struggle

    Federal courts have varied widely in their interpretation of standing for plaintiffs in consumer protection class actions since last year's U.S. Supreme Court decision in Spo

    1 minute read

  • Norguard Ins. Co. v. Lopez, 15-5032

    Publication Date: 2017-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Denis Hurley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff NorGuard Insurance Company by: Steven R. Dyki, Esq., Russo & Toner, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Natural Images Landscaping, Inc., by: Steven J. Harfenist, Esq., Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein, LLP, Lake Success, NY. Attorneys for Defendant Manuel Estuardo Lopez By: Joseph G. Dell, Esq., Dell & Dell, PLLC, Garden City, NY.

    Case Number: 15-5032

    Cite as: Norguard Ins. Co. v. Lopez, 15-5032, NYLJ 1202777813812, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 24, 2017) CASENAME Norguard Ins Company, a Pennsylvania Ins

  • People v. Forrest

    Publication Date: 2017-01-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Constitutional Law
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-01-25
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Chung L. Mar, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Carlo Andreani, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. B261130

    Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 796 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEVIN ADONIS FORREST, Def

  • Microsoft v. United States, 14-2985

    Publication Date: 2017-01-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Katzmann, C.J., Acobs, Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, Hall, Livingston, Chin, Lohier, Jr., Carney, Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Microsoft Corporation: Robert M. Loeb and Brian P. Goldman, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY; Guy Petrillo, Petrillo Klein & Boxer LLP, New York, NY; James M. Garland and Alexander A. Berengaut, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC; Bradford L. Smith, David M. Howard, John Frank, Jonathan Palmer, and Nathaniel Jones, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA; on the brief, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
    for defendant: For Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York: Serrin Turner, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, Justin Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, American Civil Liberties Union, The Constitution Project, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, in support of Appellant, Brett J. Williamson, David K. Lukmire, Nate Asher, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY; Faiza Patel, Michael Price, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY; Hanni Fakhoury, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Alex Abdo, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Apple, Inc., in support of Appellant: Kenneth M. Dreifach, Marc J. Zwillinger, Zwillgen PLLC, New York, NY and Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae BSA | The Software Alliance, Center for Democracy and Technology, Chamber of Commerce of the United States, The National Association of Manufacturers, and ACT | The App Association, in support of Appellant: Andrew J. Pincus, Paul W. Hughes, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Anthony J. Colangelo, in support of Appellant: Steven A. Engel, Dechert LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae AT&T Corp., Rackspace US, Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, i2 Coalition, and Application Developers Alliance, in support of Appellant: Alan C. Raul, Kwaku A. Akowuah, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Ireland: Peter D. Stergios, Charles D. Ray, McCarter & English, LLP, New York, NY and Hartford, CT. For Amici Curiae Amazon.com, Inc., and Accenture PLC, in support of Appellant: Peter Karanjia, Eric J. Feder, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Verizon Communications, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., eBay Inc., Salesforce.com, Inc., and Infor, in support of Appellant: Michael Vatis, Jeffrey A. Novack, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY; Randal S. Milch, Verizon Communications Inc., New York, NY; Kristofor T. Henning, Hewlett-Packard Co., Wayne, PA; Amy Weaver, Daniel Reed, Salesforce.com, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Orin Snyder, Thomas G. Hungar, Alexander H. Southwell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Mark Chandler, Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; Aaron Johnson, eBay Inc., San Jose, CA. For Amici Curiae Media Organizations, in support of Appellant: Laura R. Handman, Alison Schary, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae Computer and Data Science Experts, in support of Appellant: Philip Warrick, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Digital Rights Ireland Limited, National Council for Civil Liberties, and The Open Rights Group, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY; Edward McGarr, Simon McGarr, Dervila McGirr, McGarr Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland.

    Case Number: 14-2985

    Cite as: Microsoft v. US, 14-2985, NYLJ 1202777615376, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 24, 2017)CASE NAMEMicrosoft Corporation, Appellant v. United States of Am

  • Famular v. Whirlpool Corp., 16 CV 944

    Publication Date: 2017-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Vincent Briccetti
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 16 CV 944

    Cite as: Famular v. Whirlpool Corp., 16 CV 944, NYLJ 1202777603278, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 19, 2017) CASENAME Walt Famular, Howard Frank, Nancy Furlong

  • San Jose Unified School District v. Santa Clara County Office of Education (Rocketship Education)

    Publication Date: 2017-01-25
    Practice Area: Education Law
    Industry: Education
    Date Filed: 2017-01-24
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs, and Respondents: San Jose Unified School District et al., John Yeh, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Christopher E. Schumb, Law Offices of Christopher Schumb
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendant and Appellant: SANTA Clara County Office of Education et al., Andrew Scully Oelz, Akin Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld

    Case Number: No. H041088

    Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 728 SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondent