• December 3, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Four Litvin Blumberg Survivors Start Own Firm

    And then there were four. Nearly six months after the dissolution of Litvin Blumberg Matusow & Young was announced, Charles Young, Joseph "Pete" Ricchiuti, Theodore Caldwell and Gregory He

    1 minute read

  • July 24, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Adversaries in Appointment Dispute Have Contrasting Backgrounds

    State senators are using seasoned election law attorneys to make their case that Governor David A. Paterson lacks the authority to appoint a lieutenant governor, while Mr. Paterson's legal defense

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Lawyers on the Fast Track 2008

    Editor’s Note: Welcome to our seventh annual Lawyers on the Fast Track supplement. Each year, we at The Legal Intelligencer and Pennsylvania Law Weekly take this opport

    1 minute read

  • August 30, 2004 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Leaving Jenkens Several shareholders in Jenkens & Gilchrist who do employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) work will withdraw from the firm to move to Morgan, Lewis & Bocki

    1 minute read

  • Young v. Conway, 11-830-pr

    Publication Date: 2013-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Casejudge_
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner-Appellee: John H. Blume, Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York; Brian Shiffrin, Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin, LLP, Rochester, New York.
    for defendant: For Respondent-Appellant: For: Sandra Doorley, District Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester, New York., Geoffrey Kaeuper, Assistant District Attorney. For the Innocence Project as Amicus Curiae: James L. Brochin, Jennifer H. Wu, Cassius K. Sims, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York; Barry C. Scheck, David Loftis, Karen Newirth, Innocence Project, Inc., New York, New York.

    Case Number: 11-830-pr

    Cite as: Young v. Conway, 11-830-pr, NYLJ 1202597500937, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 23, 2013)Casejudge_Decided: April 23, 2

  • February 27, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Judge Rejects Overtime Class Action

    Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled two years ago in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 09-893

    1 minute read

  • February 17, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Corrections

    corrections There were a few errors in our Litigation Department of the Year special report [January] and one story that merited a clarification. • "Tried a

    1 minute read

  • Murdoch v. Castro

    Publication Date: 2010-06-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-21
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Seymour I. Amster, Van Nuys, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Rama R. Maline, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for the respondents-appellees.

    Case Number: No. 05-55665

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 7760 CHARLES FRANKLIN MURDOCH, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROY CASTRO, Warden; EDMUND G.

  • April 7, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Litzler v. CC Investments L.D.C.

    Decided March 29, 2004Before Jacobs, Straub and B.D. Parker, JJ. Interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1292(b), from the United States District Court for the Southern Distri

    1 minute read

  • March 26, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Circuit Seeks N.Y.'s Guidance on Liability for Disclosure

    An open question on whether a healthcare corporation can be held responsible for the disclosure of confidential patient information by a non-physician has been sent to the state's highest co

    1 minute read