Filter This View

  • September 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection List of Ineligible Attorneys

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring in le to practice law in New Jersey those attorneys not in compliance with the 2002 annual assessment. That Order and the list of in

    1 minute read

  • May 24, 2005 | National Law Journal

    Pitfalls of Mandatory Law Firm Retirement

    Even as Sidley Austin Brown & Wood and the government battle over whether 31 attorneys should get damages resulting from the firm's mandatory retirement program, many law firms are stick

    1 minute read

  • February 22, 2013 | The Recorder

    For 80-Year-Old-Firm, IP Is a Family Tradition

    SAN FRANCISCO — A portrait of a man wearing thick, black glasses and a half-smile hangs beside an ornate grandfather clock that belonged to him and his father, ticking steadil

    1 minute read

  • Villacres v. ABM Industries Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-10-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-22
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Initiative Legal Group, Marc Primo, Sharla Ann Manley, Dina S. Livhits, Orlando Arellano and Glenn A. Danas for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Littler Mendelson, Keith A. Jacoby, Dominic J. Messiha and Heather M. Davis for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. B219584

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13534CARLOS VILLACRES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ABM INDUSTRIES INC. et al., Defendants a

  • Freeman v. Sullivant

    Publication Date: 2011-02-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-03
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Greg Lester for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Diamond & Associates and David D. Diamond for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B222278

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1681TINA FREEMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SHARI SULLIVANT, Defendant and Appellant. /

  • Skelos v Paterson

    Publication Date: 2009-08-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2009-06673

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P. DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO THOMAS A. DICKERSON RAN

  • Wurtzel v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

    Publication Date: 2003-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Platt WURTZEL v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CO. — Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company (“Starbucks” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b)

  • Bilski v. Kappos

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-964

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 7966 BERNARD L. BILSKI and RAND A. WARSAW, PETITIONERS v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SE

  • Bilski v. Kappos

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-964

    BERNARD L. BILSKI and RAND A. WARSAW, PETITIONERS v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

  • January 4, 2010 | The Recorder

    Patent Bar Pushing Fogel for Fed Circuit

    Will Silicon Valley finally get a judge on the very high court of patent law? San Jose, Calif.-based U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel is on the White House short list for the

    1 minute read