• March 24, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    AstraZeneca wins case over off-label Seroquel prescriptions

    On the heels of agreeing to pay $68.5 million to settle several state suits over an antipsychotic drug, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals can claim a victory in a related suit filed by labor unions and d

    1 minute read

  • November 17, 2003 | Legal Times

    Inadmissible: JAG Casualties; Citizens for Common Defence; and More

    CASUALTIES OF WAR: JAG DEALS WITH LOSS OF TWO LEADERSThe recent crescendo of violence in Iraq hit t y's legal community last week as news spread that two leaders of t

    1 minute read

  • January 1, 2006 | The American Lawyer

    The Lifesavers

    The last two years were a crucible for Citigroup Inc., the New York-based financial services behemoth and the biggest client of the litigation department of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &

    1 minute read

  • April 28, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Price, petitioners/plaintiffs-appellants v. New York City Board of Education, respondents/defendants-respondents

    Decided April 22, 2008Before Mazzarelli, J.P.; Andrias, Saxe, Gonzalez, Sweeny, JJ.Petitioners/plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart S

    1 minute read

  • December 1, 2011 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    United Technologies Goodrich United Technologies Corporation agreed to pay $18.4 billion for Goodrich Corporation on September 21. The deal would be the largest eve

    1 minute read

  • March 4, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

    From the Upcoming Issue:It's Time for Judicial Reform in Texas

    Texans are justly proud of our state. From its commitment to open government to its pro-growth economic policies that reward fiscal discipline, hard work and ingenuity, Texas is a

    1 minute read

  • March 29, 2013 | National Law Journal

    $40.5 Million Awarded to McKesson in 30-Year Iranian Dairy Dispute

    Just as the mythological Greek king Sisyphus was doomed to forever roll a boulder up a hill, only to watch it fall as he reached the summit, a 30-year dispute over interests in an Iranian dai

    1 minute read

  • Police and Fire Retirement System of Detroit v. Indymac MBS, 11-2998-cv(L)

    Publication Date: 2013-07-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Cabranes, Raggi, and Carney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Proposed Intervenor-Appellant: General Retirement System of the City of Detroit., Jeffrey C. Zwerling, Justin M. Tarshis, on the brief, Robin F. Zwerling, Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Proposed Intervenor-Appellant: Los Angeles County Employees Retirement System., Patrick T. Egan, on the brief, Joseph J. Tabacco JR., Berman DeValerio, Boston, MA. For Proposed Intervenor-Appellant: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi., Michael J. Miarmi, Joy A. Kruse, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee: IndyMac MBS, Incorporated., William R. Stein, Scott H. Christensen, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC., Aric H. Wu, Jason W. Myatt, Dean J. Kitchens, on the brief, Robert F. Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA. For Amicus Curiae W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC in support of Intervenors-Appellants: Lawrence M. Rolnick, Thomas E. Redburn, Jr., Sheila Sadighi, Lowenstein Sandler PC, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 11-2998-cv(L), 11-3036-cv(CON)

    Cite as: Police and Fire Retirement System of Detroit v. Indymac MBS, 11-2998-cv(L), NYLJ 1202609366057, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided June 27, 2013) 11-2998-cv(L), 11-3036-cv(CON)

  • July 16, 2013 | Legaltech News

    Motion for Class Cert Filed in 'Da Silva Moore' Despite EDD Limits

    A group of six female ex-employees at public relations companies Publicis Groupe S.A. and MSLGroup have fired yet another shot in ongoing gender employment discrimination dispute with

    1 minute read

  • January 29, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    After D.C. Circuit ruling, what happens to NLRB decisions and its GC?

    In the wake of Friday’s federal court ruling a href="http://www.law.com/corporatecounsel/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1358727755785&DC_Circuit_Declares_NLRB_Recess_Appointments_Unconstitut

    1 minute read