Filter This View

  • November 7, 2012 | The Recorder

    Justices Seem to Favor Online Retailers in Suit Over Personal Data

    SAN FRANCISCO — Retailers were stunned two years ago when the California Supreme Court ruled a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/16/us-classaction-creditcards-idUSTRE71F7AL20

    1 minute read

  • November 9, 2012 | The Recorder

    California Court Seems to Favor Online Retailers in Suit Over Personal Data

    Retailers were stunned two years ago when the California Supreme Court ruled they broke a

    1 minute read

  • Szajer v. City of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2011-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-11
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Alfred T. Goodwin and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.* Opinion by Judge Zouhary
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Burton C. Jacobson, Beverly Hills, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: Carmen Trutanich, City Attorney, Blithe S. Bock, Deputy City Attorney, for the defendants-appellees.
    Case Number: No. 08-57010

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1952HELENE SZAJER; ZOLTAN SZAJER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES

  • Stacy v. Danielsen

    Publication Date: 2010-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-29
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John J. Hughes, Law Offices of John J. Hughes, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: James J. Tamulski, Emard Danoff Port Tamulski & Paetzold LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.
    Case Number: No. 09-15579

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8254BRIAN STACY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REDERIET OTTO DANIELSEN, A.S.; K.S. ARIES

  • January 11, 2013 | The Recorder

    At the Podium: In Criminal Cases, Corrigan Key to Conversation

    SAN FRANCISCO — If you're a criminal defense lawyer arguing to the California Supreme Court, it's a bad sign when Justice Carol Corrigan isn't asking questions. If the court's going out

    1 minute read

  • Graham v. The Balcor Company

    Publication Date: 2001-03-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-06
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Alfred T. Goodwin, Harry Pregerson, Warren J. Ferguson, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Constance Graham
    for defendant: John N. Iurino
    Case Number: No. 94-16411, 94

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. PER CURIAM: In 1984, Constance Graham ("Graham" ) was employed as Vice-President of Investments for the Balcor

  • October 12, 2012 | The Recorder

    At the Podium: When Ahead, No Need to Pour It on Thick

    SAN FRANCISCO — Before starting this month's special session at UC-Davis, California Supreme Court justices presented the law students on hand some tips for oral advocacy. Don't ignore o

    1 minute read

  • Employment Development Department v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Screaming Eagle, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-18
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Littler Mendelson, G. J. Stillson MacDonnell and William Hays Weissman for Strategic Outsourcing, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest and Appellant. Sandra Hughes, Barbara S. Kaufman, and Theodore S. Goodwin for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, Richard�D. Martland, Eric J. Miethke and Kurt R. Oneto for California Chamber of Commerce and California Taxpayers? Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Littler Mendelson, G. J. Stillson MacDonnell and William Hays Weissman for Strategic Outsourcing, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Wheeler & Sheehan, David Carroll Wheeler and Jennifer L. DeLoach; Littler Mendelson and William Hays Weissman for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. C059062

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14477EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMEN

  • March 1, 2010 | National Law Journal

    INADMISSIBLE

    SKILLING LAWYER RIDING A WIN O'Melveny & Myers partner Sri Srinivasan got a welcome surprise on his 43rd birthday this past Tuesday: a 9-0 U.S. Supreme Cou

    1 minute read

  • Kruse v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-09-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The plaintiff homeowners brought a putative class action against the defendants seeking, inter alia, treble damages under section 8(b) and (d) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C