• Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation v. CoTherix, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-03-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-05
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Franklin B. Gowdy, Thomas M. Peterson, Benjamin P. Smith, Christopher J. Banks and Matthew J. Poole for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, Nancy L. Fineman, Nanci E. Nishimura; Baker Botts, Aaron Streett, Michele A. Gustafson; Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Susan H. Handelman; Bingham McCutchen, James B. Lewis; Mayer Brown, Lee N. Abrams; and Michael D. Liberty for Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. A129146

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 2693 ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COTHERIX, INC., Defen

  • Peter Bistrian v. Warden Troy Levi, Fdc Philadelphia; Assistant Warden Tracy Brown

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-24
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Ambro, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-3629

    PRECEDENTIALArgued March 7, 2012Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA, and AMBRO, Circuit JudgesOPINION OF THE COURTTwenty-seven employees of the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia (&a

  • Fait v. Regions Financial Corp., 10-2311-cv

    Publication Date: 2011-08-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Pooler, B.D. Parker, and Lohier, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric Alan Isaacson, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA (Darren J. Robbins, Andrew J. Brown, Amanda M. Frame, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; Samuel H. Rudman, David A Rosenfeld, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: David B. Tulchin (William J. Snipes, on the brief), Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY, for Regions and Individual Defendants-Appellees.

    Case Number: 10-2311-cv

    Cite as: Fait v. Regions Financial Corp., 10-2311-cv, NYLJ 1202512437072, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 23, 2011)Before: Pooler, B.D. Parker, and Lohier,

  • November 22, 2004 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    New White House Counsel Early in the morning on Nov. 17, R. Bruce LaBoon, a senior partner in Locke Liddell & Sapp, received a call from an enthralled Harriet Miers, his for

    1 minute read

  • January 11, 2005 | Alm

    Supreme Court Set to Enter Tort Battle

    As the White House and Congress gear up for yet another run at tort reform, two cases set for argument at the U.S. Supreme Court this week underline the crucial role the justices also play in

    1 minute read

  • March 12, 2007 | Legal Times

    D.C. Circuit Strikes Down Gun-Control Law, Priming Issue for High Court

    The Supreme Court has avoided spelling out the meaning of the Second Amendment's right to bear arms for nearly 70 years. But after a ruling Friday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit,

    1 minute read

  • June 26, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Court Reduces Punitives in Exxon Spill Case

    WASHINTON - A punitive damage award in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case that once amounted to $5 billion was knocked down to $507.5 million yesterday by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    1 minute read

  • September 13, 2001 | Legal Times

    Conservative Settles Into Department of Energy GC Role

    Lee Liberman Otis' father was a utility lawyer. And when she clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in the 1980s, she handled energy suits among a wide mix of administrative cases.

    1 minute read

  • June 3, 2002 | Legal Times

    Litigation to Test Reach of Festo

    The Supreme Court last week partly lifted the cloud of uncertainty that was cast over the intellectual property community by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's closely watched F

    1 minute read

  • February 9, 2010 | National Law Journal

    CSX Chases Plaintiffs Firm Over Asbestos Claims

    A railroad company's dogged pursuit of conspiracy and fraud charges against an asbestos law firm is unfolding in a federal appellate court and with a major assist from business and tort reform grou

    1 minute read