Filter This View

  • April 7, 2005 | The Recorder

    What Can Customers Really Waive?

    Credit card holder Christopher Boehr was outraged when he learned that Discover Bank imposed a $29 late fee on some customers even if their payments arrived on the due date.But when he

    1 minute read

  • November 2, 2007 | National Law Journal

    Justices take critical look at arbitration

    For most of the 30 years that Donald J. Friedman has been handling commercial arbitrations, companies and their lawyers have been willing to use the procedure without all the "bells and whist

    1 minute read

  • June 26, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Justices Strike Down DOMA in Landmark Ruling

    WASHINGTON — Marking a major civil rights turning point, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act and paved the way for equal treatm

    1 minute read

  • November 30, 2005 | Legal Times

    Justices Hear Key Antitrust Case on 'Tying' Patented Products

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed ready to hand a victory to patent holders in a closely watched antitrust case that could have a broad impact on intellectual property law.Though jus

    1 minute read

  • March 16, 2006 | The Recorder

    Hot Intellectual Properties

    Stanford Law School patent professor Mark Lemley has become one of the most sought-after lawyers in town. Companies vie for his representation, and law conference organizers flock to sign him up as

    1 minute read

  • April 7, 2005 | The Recorder

    Calif. Justices to Consider Credit Card Holders' Ability to File Class Actions

    Credit card holder Christopher Boehr was outraged when he learned that Discover Bank imposed a $29 late fee on some customers even if their payments arrived on the due date.But when he

    1 minute read

  • June 27, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Majority Finds Law Violates Protection, Due Process Rights

    WASHINGTON - Marking a major civil rights turning point, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act and paved the way for equal treatment under

    1 minute read

  • March 14, 2006 | The Recorder

    Hot Intellectual Properties

    Stanford Law School patent professor Mark Lemley has become one of the most sought-after lawyers in town. Companies vie for his representation, and law conference organizers flock to sign him

    1 minute read

  • August 12, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Curious Sideshow to YouTube Infringement Litigation: 'Helicopter Journalist' Represented by Proskauer Settles Leaked Document Case for $20,000

    On Wednesday, Viacom's lawyers from Jenner & Block and Shearman & Sterling filed a notice of appeal, announcing their intenti

    1 minute read

  • Gonzalez v. State of Arizona

    Publication Date: 2010-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-26
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nina Perales, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, San Antonio, Texas, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Jesus M. Gonzalez, et al. Jon M. Greenbaum, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs-Appellants Inter Tribal Council, et al. Karen J. Hartman-Tellez, Phoenix, Arizona, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Inter-Tribal Council, et al.
    for defendant: Barbara A. Bailey, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellees State of Arizona and Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett. Mary R. O?Grady, Solicitor General, Phoenix, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellees State of Arizona and Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett. Dennis Wilenchik, Wilenchik and Bartness, P.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellees Shelly Baker, La Paz County Recorder, et al. Sam Hirsch, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amicus Curiae The League of Women Voters of the United States. Kali N. Bracey, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amicus Curiae The League of Women Voters of the United States. Jessica Ring Amunson, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amicus Curiae The League of Women Voters of the United States. Barnaby W. Zall, Weinberg & Jacobs, LLP, Rockville, Maryland, on behalf of Amicus Curiae American Unity Legal Defense Fund, Inc. Charles E. Borden, O?Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amicus Curiae National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund. Joel M. Spector, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Lakewood, Colorado, on behalf of Amicus Curiae Mountain States Legal Foundation. Michael J. Reitz, Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Olympia, Washington, on behalf of Amicus Curiae Evergreen Freedom Foundation. Brian D. Netter, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amici Curiae Congressman Robert A. Brady, Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, Congressman Charles A. Gonzalez, Congressman Raul M. Grijalva, and Congressman Jose E. Serrano. Richard A. Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Amici Curiae Protect Arizona Now, Washington Legal Foundation, and Allied Educational Foundation.
    Case Number: No. 08-17094 No. 08-17115

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13590MARIA M. GONZALEZ,; LUCIANO VALENCIA; THE INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC.; ARIZONA ADVOCACY NETWORK; STEVE M. GALLARDO; LEAGUE OF