Filter This View

  • Milliken & Co. et al., Respondents v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant, and City of New York et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.), 84 N.Y.2d 469 (1994)

    Publication Date: 2012-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals, New York County
    Judge: Before: Ch.J Kaye and J.J Simons, Titone, Smith, Levine and Ciparick Concur.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: Maura A. Kilroy, New York City, and Richard W. Babinecz for appellant in the first, second and third above-entitled actions. Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Michael McLoughlin and Stephen J. McGrath of counsel), for City of New York, respondent in the first, second and third aboveentitled actions. Kornstein Veisz & Wexler, New York City (Joel Bossom, Marvin Wexler, Lawrence C. Fox and Emily Rosdeitcher of counsel), and Stuart S. Sherman for Empire City Subway Company (Limited) and another, respondents in the first, second and third above-entitled actions. Wien, Malkin & Bettex, New York City (Douglas D. Aronin and Eli R. Mattioli of counsel), and Smith, Mazure, Director, Wilkins Young, Yagerman & Tarallo, P. C., for HelmsleySpear, Inc., and others, respondents in the first, second and third above-entitled actions. Gair, Gair, Conason Steigman & Mackauf, New York City (Rhonda E. Kay of counsel), for Milliken & Co. and others, respondents in the first and second above-entitled actions. Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City (James J. Taylor and Elaine P. Chryssochoos of counsel), for I.S.K. Manhattan, Inc., and others, respondents in the third above-entitled action. Huber Lawrence & Abell, New York City (John D. Draghi and Michael Zaitz of counsel), for Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation and others, amici curiae, in the first, second and third above-entitled actions.
    Case Number: 84 N.Y.2d 469 (1994)

    Cite as: Milliken & Co. et al. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc., 84 N.Y.2d 469 (1994), NYLJ 1202578801965, at *1 (Ct. of App., NY, Decided December 1, 1994)p cla

  • April 14, 2004 | National Law Journal

    Overtime Requirements

    In July 2001, a jury awarded claims adjusters for Farmers Insurance Exchange more than $90 million. There was no finding that Farmers engaged in any malicious conduct or intentional wrongdoing

    1 minute read

  • Lee v. Rivera, 117713/04

    Publication Date: 2010-02-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Paul Wooten
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 117713/04

    Justice Paul Wooten NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Wooten Motion sequence 002 is resolved as follows: On or about March 5, 2005, plainti

  • LITWACK v. PLAZA REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

    Publication Date: 2004-12-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 36 Justice Shafer Defendants move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing the complaint, on the grounds that: (1) defendants did not have

  • July 22, 1999 | New York Law Journal

    Parents May Appear Pro Se in SSI Cases

    In an unusual joint opinion, two Southern District judges have found that parents may appear pro se in federal court on behalf of their children to appeal the denial of Supplemental Security Income

    1 minute read

  • Hollwedel v. Scaboody's Inc.

    Publication Date: 2005-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    WESTCHESTER COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Dillon On September 18, 1990, the plaintiff, Matthew Mark Manchester Hollwedel (hereinafter referred to as either the "Plainti

  • People c. v. William "II"

    Publication Date: 2002-06-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 67

    3 No. 67 The People & c., Respondent, v. William "II", Appellant. --------------------------------- 2 No. 81 SSM 8 The People &am

  • Brenda Liz Viera A/K/A v. Carmelo Manuel Viera

    Publication Date: 2011-01-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 8
    Judge: Guadalupe Rivera, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-08-00333-CV

    OPINIONIn this divorce action, Brenda Liz Viera, Appellant, appeals the trial court's division of the marital estate and the designation of Carmelo Manuel Viera, Appellee, as joint managing conserv

  • Tikunov v. The Museum of Modern Art

    Publication Date: 2004-11-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 47 Justice Omansky In this action for personal injuries arising out of negligence and alleged violation of sections 200, 240(1) and 241(6) of the

  • United States v. Bruno, 10-1885

    Publication Date: 2011-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: B.D. Parker and Chin, C.JJ., and Korman, D.J.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: Elizabeth C. Coombe (William C. Pericak, Brenda K. Sannes, on the brief), Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, for Richard S. Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, Albany NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: Abbe David Lowell (Paul M. Thompson, Jeffrey W. Mikoni, on the brief), McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 10-1885

    Cite as: United States v. Bruno, 10-1885, NYLJ 1202532760081, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 16, 2011)Before: B.D. Parker and Chin, C.JJ., and Korman,