• Matter of Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. New York State Racing and Wagering Board, 501863

    Publication Date: 2007-12-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-11-29
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 501863

    APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT Neil H. Tiger, Corporation Counsel, Hauppauge, for Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation, appellant. Stern & Rindner,

  • Terrell, et al. v. Pampa Independent School District

    Publication Date: 2011-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Mackey K. Hancock Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 07-10-00212-CV

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.OPINIONAppellants, Rebecca Terrell and Chandrashekhar Thanedar,*fn1 are appealing the granting of a su

  • People v. Styles, 2009-353

    Publication Date: 2010-07-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: County Court, Chemung County
    Judge: Judge Peter C. Buckley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the People: John R. Thweatt, Esq., Chief Assistant District Attorney, Weeden Wetmore, District Attorney
    for defendant: For the Defendant: Christopher Barton, Esq.

    Case Number: 2009-353

    Judge Peter C. BuckleyDecided: June 24, 2010For the People: John R. Thweatt, Esq., Chief Assistant District Attorney, Weeden W

  • May 6, 2002 |

    news in brief

    news in brief Firms Can Keep $1 Billion From Tax Breaks Harrisburg - Pennsylvania manufacturers will get to keep $1 billion from an old tax break that the state Supreme Court rec

    1 minute read

  • In the Interest of D.W.J.B.

    Publication Date: 2012-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 6
    Judge: Bailey C. Moseley Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-11-00093-CV

     Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.Opinion by Justice Moseley Concurring Opinion by Justice CarterOPINIONThe maternal grandmother of D. W. J. B

  • FCI Group, Inc. v City of New York

    Publication Date: 2008-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3029

    Karla Moskowitz, JJ. 3029 FCI Group, Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v The City of New York, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Defendants appeal from an order of th

  • Perez v. Sapra, 30071/2007

    Publication Date: 2009-06-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-10
    Court: Civil Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Judge Margaret Chan KINGS COUNTY Civil Court Attorney for Plaintiff: George D. Silva for Bisogno & Meyerson, LLP Attorney for Defendant: Jeffrey J. Harri

  • Gonzales v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Mackey K. Hancock Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-07-0302-CR

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARINGBy opinion dated October 3, 2008, this court affirmed the trial court's judgments regarding appellant's convictions

  • August 13, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    When a Client Post-Trial Says: 'I Perjured Myself'

    Consider this hypothetical scenario: O.J. Simpson II went on trial this year in New York for the murder of his wife, Nicole White Simpson, and Ron Goldstein. He was represented at trial by D

    1 minute read

  • Byer v. Hippolite

    Publication Date: 2003-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: District Court, Nassau County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Judge Fairgrieve BYER v. HIPPOLITE — DECISION AFTER HEARING This case involves a unique legal issue, regarding the Nassau County District Court’s jurisdiction to evict