Filter This View

  • Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of Education

    Publication Date: 2013-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-11
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doll Amir & Eley, Michael M. Amir, Mary Tesh Glarum, Lloyd Vu and Hemmy So for Plaintiff and Respondent and for Plaintiff and Appellant. Debra J. La Fetra, Damien M. Schiff and Joshua P. Thompson for Pacific Legal Foundation and Options for Youth as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Ricardo J. Soto, Phillipa L. Altmann, Julie Ashby Umansky; McKenna Long & Aldridge and Charles A. Bird for California Charter Schools Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Amy Bisson Holloway, Edmundo R. Aquilar and Todd M. Smith for State Board of Education, California Department of Education and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson as Amici Curiae.
    for defendant: Vibiana M. Andrade, Sung Yon Lee; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Timothy T. Coates and Alison M. Turner for Defendants and Appellants and for Defendants and Respondents. Best Best & Krieger, Dina Harris and Megan M. Moore for Riverside County Office of Education and San Diego County Office of Education as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. David Holmquist and Devora Navera Reed for Los Angeles Unified School District as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. Dannis Woliver Kelly, Sue Ann Salmon Evans and William B. Tunick for Education Legal Alliance of the California School Boards Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S195852 No. S195852

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7332 TODAY'S FRESH START, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v

  • March 12, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    By Ritter, J.P.; Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ.By Ritter, J.P.; Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ.Cudjoe, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 104968)

    1 minute read

  • June 25, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    For the Third Time, Reed Smith Blocks Class Certification in St. Jude Heart Implant Case

    When the Litigation Daily stumbled upon the U.S. government's web site devoted to product recalls, we were blown away by the sheer volume of defective s

    1 minute read

  • May 25, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    News In Brief

    Thelen Bankruptcy Estate Seeks Settlement Approval The estate of the defunct law firm Thelen is seeking a bankruptcy judge's approval of a href="http://www.nylj.com/ny

    1 minute read

  • October 10, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Associates Class of 2008

    Normal 0 false false false

    1 minute read

  • August 11, 2012 | Litigation Daily

    What's Behind Quinn's Antics in Apple-Samsung Trial?

    This article originally appeared in The Recorder, an affiliate publication. John Quinn--crazy, or crazy like a fox? As the Apple/Samsung trial ente

    1 minute read

  • People v. Sanchez

    Publication Date: 2010-10-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-19
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, David Andrew Eldridge, and Jamie A. Scheidegger, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Eleanor M. Kraft, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. F057147

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13300THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUIS OSCAR SANCHEZ, Defendant and Appellant.

  • December 22, 2006 | The Recorder

    Calif. Supremes find hole in tribe immunity

    The California Supreme Court took a controversial stand Thursday by ruling that the state can sue Indian tribes for failing to disclose campaign contributions and lobbying activi

    1 minute read

  • June 27, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Eberhard, intervenor-appellant v. Marcu, receiver-appellee

    Decided June 20, 2008 Before Cabranes, Sotomayor, and Wesley, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (B

    1 minute read

  • US v. Julian Tzolov, 10-562-cr (Lead) 10-754-cr (XAP)

    Publication Date: 2011-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Feinberg, B.D. Parker, and Wesley, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: STEVEN F. MOLO, EDWARD F. DANIELS, New York, NY (Robert K. Kry, Washington, DC, on the brief), Molo Lamken LLP; Paul T. Weinstein, Emmet, Marvin & Martin, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellant.
    for defendant: JOHN P. NOWAK (Daniel A. Spector, Jo Ann M. Navickas; on the brief), Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, for Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.
    Case Number: 10-562-cr (Lead) 10-754-cr (XAP)

    Cite as: US v. Julian Tzolov, 10-562-cr, NYLJ 1202497616813, at *1 (2cir, Decided June 15, 2011)Before: Feinberg, B.D. Parker, and Wesley, C.JJ. p cl