• April 13, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Instant Appeal Certified in Chocolate Price-Fixing Case

    Facing accusations of price fixing, the nation's leading chocolate manufacturers have persuaded a federal judge in Harrisburg, Pa., to certify an immediate appeal of his decision not to dismiss 87

    1 minute read

  • January 14, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Overturns Mil Award In an Antitrust Case Against 3M

    Overturning a $68 million verdict, a divided federal appeals court ruled Monday that office supply giant 3M did not violate antitrust laws in its competitive efforts in the market for transparent t

    1 minute read

  • In re Colon

    Publication Date: 2009-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-05-04
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Hartz, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-3313

    PUBLISHBefore MURPHY, Circuit Judge, BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge, and HARTZ, Circuit Judge.A bankruptcy trustee, who acts in the interests of the debtor's general creditors, may acquire for the

  • Gilb v. Chiang

    Publication Date: 2010-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-02
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: K. William Curtis, Warren C. Stracener, Linda A. Mayhew, Christopher E. Thomas for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Kaye Scholer, Steven S. Rosenthal, Marc S. Cohen, Jay W. Waks, and Bryant Delgadillo; Richard J. Chivaro, Ronald V. Placet and Shawn D. Silva for Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Brooks Ellison and Patrick J. Whalen for California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, etc.; Paul E. Harris III, Brooke D. Pierman; Olson Hagel & Fishburn, Deborah B. Caplan, N. Eugene Hill and Richard C. Miadich for Service Employees International Union, Yvonne Walker, Pamela Handel, Tamekia Robinson and Kathleen Phillips; Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Gary M. Messing, Gregg McLean Adam and Jonathan Yank, for California Correctional Peace Officers? Association and California Statewide Law Enforcement Association; Daniel M. Lindsay for California Correctional Peace Officers? Association; Kasey C. Clark for California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, Interveners and Appellants.

    Case Number:

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8598DAVID A. GILB, as Director, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHN CHI

  • Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bryan McCulley, McCulley McCluer PLLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Fred A. Kelly, Jr., Sarah E. Andre, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees New Albertson?s. Inc. and Supervalu Inc. Gregory P. Stone, Michael R. Doyes, Carolyn H. Luedtke, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Safeway Inc. Matt Oster, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Walgreen Co. Laurence A. Weiss, Kristi K. Elder, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellee The Kroger Co. Steven H. Frankel, Sandra D. Hauser, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Peter Buscemi, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Rite Aid Corp. Tami S. Smason, Robert H. Griffith, Page R. Barnes, Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees CVS Caremark Corp. and Longs Drugs Stores Corp.

    Case Number: No. 10-15338

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 1739 SKILSTAF, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. p cla

  • Cooper v. Lyon Financial Services, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: John S. Anderson Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14-99-01367-CV

    AFFIRMED AND OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 15, 2001.OPINIONAppellee, Lyon Financial Services ("Lyon"), d/b/a Secured Funding Source, sued appellants, Bruce T. Cooper a/k/a Dr. Bruce Cooper, Bruce Coope

  • Monistere v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-17
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Leslie H. Southwick, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-31149

    Published opinionBefore JONES, Chief Judge, and OWEN and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.This litigation concerns a home located in Metairie, Louisiana that was severely damaged in 2005 by Hurricane K

  • Paradigm Biodevices, Inc., Plaintiff v. Viscogliosi Brothers, LLC, Viscogliosi & Company, LLC, Paradigm Spine, LLC, Centinel Spine, Inc., John J. Viscogliosi, and Anthony G. Viscogliosi, Defendants, 11 Civ. 3489 (RJH) (MHD)

    Publication Date: 2012-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Richard J. Holwell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11 Civ. 3489 (RJH) (MHD)

    Cite as: Paradigm Biodevices, Inc. v. Viscogliosi Brothers, LLC, 11 Civ. 3489 (RJH) (MHD), NYLJ 1202541855387, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 2, 2012)Distr

  • Gavish v. Revlon Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Stein Plaintiffs have brought this class action alleging that defendants violated sections 10(b) and 20(a) of t

  • May 11, 2009 | The Recorder

    In re E.S.

    C.A. 4th D052768 The Fourth Appellate District affirmed an order. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that Family Code §3041, which governs custody disputes

    1 minute read