• Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: GARY D. SESSER (William F. Sondericker, Laura Anne Reeds, and Christopher J. Young, on the brief), Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, New York, for Intervenor-Appellant D. David Cohen. THOMAS G. AMON, Law Offices of Thomas G. Amon, New York, New York, and Brian J. Robbins, and Gregory E. Del Gaizo, on the brief, Robbins Umeda LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee Alvin Viray, Derivatively on Behalf of DHB Industries, Inc.
    for defendant: ERIC RIEDER (David P. Kasakove and Chris M. LaRocco, of counsel, on the brief), Bryan Cave LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee DHB Industries, Inc., now known as Point Blank Solutions, Inc.. MARK HOLLAND (Mary K. Dulka, on the brief), Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Barry Berkman, Cary Chasin, Gary Nadelman, and Jerome Krantz. JEROME GOTKIN, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee David H. Brooks. STEVEN G. KOBRE (Francisco J. Navarro, on the brief), Kobre & Kim LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee Dawn M. Schlegel. RACHEL PENSKI, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees David Brooks International, Inc., Elizabeth Brooks International, Inc., and Andrew Brooks International, Inc.

    Case Number: 08-3860-cv

    Cite as: Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv, NYLJ 1202472745889, at *1 (2d Cir, Decided September 30, 2010)Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.p class="decid

  • August 4, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Mauskopf's Team Is Now Complete

    Nearly a year after taking office, Eastern District U.S. Attorney Roslynn Mauskopf has rounded out her staff with a Justice Department attorney with experience on the policy side of t

    1 minute read

  • June 3, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Opt-Out Plaintiffs Clinch Deal in Citigroup Securities Case

    A coalition of about 20 institutional investors have wrested a settlement from Citigroup Inc. in a long-running suit over the banks' role in the financial crisis.In a a href="htt

    1 minute read

  • May 11, 2011 | The Recorder

    People v. Butler

    C.A. 2nd B218946 The Second Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that a perpetrator could be

    1 minute read

  • APPEARANCES: For Claimants: SULLIVAN GALLESHAW, LLP,By: Keith Sullivan, Esq. FASULO, SHALLEY DIMAGGIO, By: Louis V. Fasulo, Esq. For Defendant: ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL,By: Ross N

    Publication Date: 2010-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    APPEARANCES: For Claimants: SULLIVAN & GALLESHAW, LLP,By: Keith Sullivan, Esq. FASULO, SHALLEY & DIMAGGIO, By: Louis V. Fasulo, Esq. For Defendant: A

  • Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. Dorit Baxter Skin Care Inc.

    Publication Date: 2006-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Peter Leisure
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Leisure Plaintiff Indian Harbor Insurance Company, as subrogee of George Lax, d/b/a VP 57, LLC, brings this sub

  • Panagis Vartelas, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent, 09-0649-ag

    Publication Date: 2010-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Kearse, Cabranes, and Livingston, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew K. Chow, New York, New York (Neil A. Weinrib & Associates, New York, New York, on the brief), for Petitioner.
    for defendant: Keith I. McManus, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for Respondent. *1Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, refusing to reopen removal proceeding on petitioner's motion asserting that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to assert (a) that the crime of which petitioner had been convicted was a petty, nonremovable, offense within the scope of 8 U.S.C. §1182 (a) (2) (A) (ii) (II), and (b) that 8 U.S.C. §1101 (a) (13), as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, could not be applied retroactively.

    Case Number: 09-0649-ag

    Cite as: Vartelas v. Holder, 09-0649-ag, NYLJ 1202472054411, at *1 (2CIR, Decided September 09, 2010)Before: Kearse, Cabranes, and Livingston, C.JJ.p class

  • Mahler v. Campagna, 2025/07, Decided: May 25, 2010

    Publication Date: 2010-06-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge: Thomas Feinman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2025/07, Decided: May 25, 2010

    Justice Thomas Feinman NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiff, Pro se: David J. Mahler, Esq. Justice T. Feinman a href="http://nycourts.law.com/cpnylj/ju

  • January 18, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Tax Litigation Issues

    When the government conducts a criminal tax investigation, it is inevitable that federal prosecutors will reach out to the accountants who worked for the targeted individual or entity or prepa

    1 minute read

  • Alcantara v. Attorney General of the United States

    Publication Date: 2009-04-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-01-26
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-3978

    December 24, 2008Present: SLOVITER, FUENTES and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.Submitted are:(1) By the Clerk for possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect;(2) Respondent's motion to dismi