Filter This View

  • Henry v. Ryan

    Publication Date: 2013-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-19
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Richard C. Tallman, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, Robin C. Konrad (argued) and Amy E. B. Kapp, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Phoenix, Arizona, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, Kent Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section, and Jonathan Bass (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section, Tucson, Arizona, for Respondents-Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 09-99007

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6260 GRAHAM S. HENRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN, Resp

  • Graham v. Florida

    Publication Date: 2010-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-17
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-7412

    TERRANCE JAMAR GRAHAM, PETITIONER v.FLORIDANo. 08-7412In the Supreme Cour

  • Barnes Foundation v. Township of Lower Merion

    Publication Date: 2001-03-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Greenberg, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-2055

    Argued October 5, 2000OPINION OF THE COURTI. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL HISTORYA. Factual HistoryThis matter comes on before this court on appeal from an order entered on November 24, 1999,

  • Etan Industries, Inc. v. Lehmann

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-07-00539-CV

    OPINIONThis appeal from a judgment following a jury trial arises from a dispute between appellant Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., d/b/a CMA Cablevision and/or CMA Communications ("

  • Matter of Lakeside Family and Children's Services v. Conchita J.

    Publication Date: 2006-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Family Court, Queens County
    Judge: Marybeth Richroath
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    QUEENS COUNTY Family Court Judge Richroath On December 24, 2001, Hon. Fran L. Lubow

  • O'Carolan v. Hopper

    Publication Date: 2013-07-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-21
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: David Puryear, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-10-00407-CV

    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-98-010618, HONORABLE JEFF L. ROSE,

  • California Oak Foundation v. The Regents of the University of California

    Publication Date: 2010-09-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-03
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris, for Plaintiffs and Appellants
    for defendant: Reed Smith LLP, Paul D. Fogel, Dennis Peter Maio, for Defendants and Respondents Office of the General Counsel, University of California, Charles F. Robinson, Eric K. Behrens, Kelly L. Drumm, for Defendants and Respondents Sanger & Olson, John M. Sanger, Charles R. Olson, for Defendants and Respondents Belzer, Hulchiy & Murray, Nicholas P. Hulchiy, for Defendant and Respondent Steven Barry Piser, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. A122511

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11709CALIFORNIA OAK FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNI

  • Monica Moreno, Appellant v. Ernesto and Pilar Perez, Appellees

    Publication Date: 2011-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Sherry Radack Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 01-09-00921-CV

    OPINIONThis is an appeal from an order modifying the parent-child relationship. We affirm in part and reverse in part.BACKGROUNDIn 2002, appellant Monica Moreno and Ernesto Perez, Jr. w

  • People v. Judith Clark

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    County Court Judge Resnik Defendant moves pursuant to CPL §440.10(1)(h) to vacate the judgment of conviction against her following a jury verdict of guilty, rendered Oct

  • March 10, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Early Redemption of Notes May Not Be Avoided in Bankruptcy

    A recent federal district court decision has broadly interpreted the safe harbor in §546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code to insulate payments made to redeem commercial paper. District Judge Colleen

    1 minute read