Filter This View

  • King v. Aramark Servs. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-03-28
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Bet Robinson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Josephine Ann Greco, Greco Trapp, PLLC, Buffalo, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Anne Martinez, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Jade Yee, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL, on the brief, Stephanie Schuster, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 22-1237

    Continuing Violation Doctrine Renders Title VII Hostile Worksite Claims Timely

  • Orta v. SN Operating, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-03-25
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Personal Injury | Wrongful Death
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Valenzuela
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-23-00062-CV

    After two days on a new job at an oil drill site, decedent fell down some stairs. On the drive home, decedent had to stop and vomit.

  • Mancuso v. Cadles of West Virginia, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-02-20
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Presiding Judge Barnes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter Mancuso, Conyers, for appellant.
    for defendant: Donald Suessmith, (McCurdy & Candler, L.L.C.), Decatur,for appellee.
    Case Number: A23A1379

    Court reverses revival of dormant judgment due to improper service by a private process server, rather than a county sheriff as required by statute

  • Revitalize Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust v. National Grid USA

    Publication Date: 2024-02-15
    Practice Area: Environmental Law
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Beth Robinson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Laura E. Jensen, on the brief, Jeffrey D. Talbert, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, LLP, Portland, ME. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Alan J. Knauf, Linda R. Shaw, Amy K. Kendall, Jonathan R. Tantillo, Knauf Shaw LLP, Rochester, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation: Steven T. Miano, Peter V. Keays, on the brief, Robert A. Wiygul, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA. For Defendant-Appellee General Electric Company: Dean S. Sommer, Kristin Carter Rowe, Young/Sommer LLC, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Northeast Management Services, Inc.: Douglas H. Zamelis, The Law Office of Douglas H. Zamelis, Cooperstown, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC and Hauler's Facility LLC: Gregory M. Brown, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees National Grid USA and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation: Yvonne E. Hennessey, Barclay Damon LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Verizon New York Inc. as successor to Telesector Resources Group, Inc.: Philip H. Gitlen, Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Honeywell International Inc.: Geoffrey Michael, Lauren C. Daniel, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, and Syracuse LePage LLC: Michael A. Fogel, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, Syracuse LePage LLC, Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC, Hauler's Facility LLC: Patrick D. Donnelly, McGivney, Kluger Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Amparit Industries, LLC: Lori E. Petrone, Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak, LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee B&B Family Limited Partnership: Joseph R. Talarico, II, Talarico Law Firm, Fayetteville, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Jagar Enterprises, Inc.: Linda E. Alario, Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Magna Powertrain USA, Inc., and New Process Gear, Inc.: John J. Kuster, Sidney Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Onondaga Pottery Company, Inc.: Andrew C. Rose, Nixon Peabody LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Metalico New York, Inc. and Metalico Syracuse Realty, Inc.: Albert J. Millus, Jr., Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton, NY. For Defendants-Appellees C&S Engineers, Inc. and Calocerinos and Spina: Paul D. Sylvestri, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Rochester NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Corporation, Carlyle Air Conditioning Company Inc., and Raytheon Technologies Corporation f/k/a United Technologies Corporation: Elizabeth C. Barton, Erick M. Sandler, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT. For Defendant-Appellee Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Glen R. Stuart, Adina D. Bingham, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, and Bernard J. Garbutt, III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Nokia of America Corporation and Western Electric Company, Incorporated: Meaghan G. Boyd, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, and David Venderbush, Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Gardner Denver, Inc.: Daniel T. Flaherty, Daniel C.W. Narvey, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee
    Case Number: 22-1589-cv

    Consent Decree Resolved Only RACER's CERCLA Liability as to Plant, Pollutants Therefrom

  • Roe v. St. John's University

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Robert D. Sack
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant: Michael Valentine, on the brief, The Law Office of Michael Valentine, Brooklyn, NY, Peter G. Eikenberry, Law Office of Peter G. Eikenberry, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Michael J. Goettig, on the brief, Lyle S. Zuckerman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee: Victoria L. Stork, on the brief, Baker & Hostetler LLP, New York, NY, Chardaie C. Charlemagne, Baker & Hostetler LLP, San Francisco, CA.
    Case Number: 21-1125

    Inference of Sex Discrimination in University's Disciplinary Proceedings Not Raised

  • Restaurant Law Center v. City of New York

    Publication Date: 2024-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Labor Law
    Industry: Food and Beverage | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Alison J. Nathan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Leni D. Battaglia, James D. Nelson, on the brief, William R. Peterson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Houston, TX. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Angelo I. Amador, Restaurant Law Center, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Richard Dearing, Claude S. Platton, on the brief, Elina Druker, for Hon. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, N.Y. For Amici Curiae States of New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Washington, and the District of Columbia in support of Defendants-Appellees: Ester Murdukhayeva, Deputy Solicitor General & Stephen J. Yanni, Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, for Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, N.Y.
    Case Number: 22-491-CV

    Wrongful Discharge Law Not Preempted by NLRA, Does Not Violate Dormant Commerce Clause

  • Senior Care Living v. Preston

    Publication Date: 2023-12-11
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Contracts | Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Farris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-21-00602-CV

    Appellant Mark C. Bouldin is a real estate developer of several assisted living facilities for seniors and president and owner of the entity that manages appellant Senior Care Living VI, LLC.

  • Pineda v. Lewis et al.

    Publication Date: 2023-10-26
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John Husser, (Husser & Husser, P.C.), Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: Melissa Hise, (Palmour Law Firm), Summerville, Albert Palmour, (Attorney at Law), Summerville, Albert Palmour, Summerville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A23A0909

    Court reverses probate court's grant of private way because party seeking that right did not establish a prescriptive right but only a historical permissive use of a shared driveway

  • Pauwels v. Deloitte LLP

    Publication Date: 2023-10-18
    Practice Area: Trade Secrets
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Robert D. Sack
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Joshua I. Schiller, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Deloitte LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte USA LLP: John P. Del Monaco, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY; Matthew D. Rowan, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, on the brief, John F. Hartmann, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL. For Defendants-Appellees Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon: Keri L. Engelman, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Boston, MA; Catherine L. Eschbach, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Houston, TX, on the brief, Michael L. Banks, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA.
    Case Number: 22-21-cv

    Independent Contractor Fails to Allege That His Valuation Tool Was a Trade Secret

  • Rush v. The State

    Publication Date: 2023-08-23
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Judge Gobeil
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brock Johnson, (Johnson Law Firm LLC), Gainesville, for appellant.
    for defendant: William Langley, (District Attorney), Blairsville, Blair Mahaffey, (Assistant District Attorney Lumpkin County District Attorney’s Office), Dahlonega, for appellee,
    Case Number: A23A0637

    Court affirms drug convictions over defendant's challenge to legality of a traffic stop and the prolonging of that stop, and contentions of an illegal search