Filter This View

  • R. C. Acres Inc. v. Cambridge Faire Properties LLC

    Publication Date: 2015-06-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Boggs, Michael P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary Owens, Anandhi Rajan, and Bradley Wolff Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers LLP, Atlanta, for R. C. Acres Inc.. Jennifer Chapin, Atlanta, Anita Kant, Roswell, and James Teague, Cumming, for Cambridge Faire Properties LLC. Keisha M. Chambless and James Teague Teague Chambless LLP, Cumming, for Mommies Properties LLC. Vinay Bose, Atlanta, proceeded pro se.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A14A1688; A14A1689; A14A2102

    The new Georgia Evidence Code does not limit cross-examination to the scope of direct, as it does not track the federal

  • June 1, 2015 | Texas Lawyer

    The Lanier Law Firm a 'Hired Gun' in Case With $9 Billion Verdict

    The Lanier Law Firm accomplished something in 2014 that it had not done before—it won a more than $9 billion jury verdict."Winning $9 billion is something I'd never done," sa

    1 minute read

  • May 31, 2015 | Texas Lawyer

    The Lanier Law Firm a 'Hired Gun' in Case With $9 Billion Verdict

    The case was the first to go to trial over the link between prescription diabetes drug Actos and bladder cancer.

    1 minute read

  • The Four County Bank v. Tidewater Equip. Co.

    Publication Date: 2015-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Branch, Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel Wilder Law Offices of Emmett L. Goodman Jr. LLC, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Eugene Hatcher and Allen Orr Anderson Walker Reichert LLP, Macon, for appellee.
    Case Number: A14A1677

    The trial court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant in a bank's suit for trover and conversion, since the bank failed to file continuation statements in connection with its security i

  • People v. Trujeque

    Publication Date: 2015-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-05-28
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Jaime L. Fuster, Joseph P. Lee and Eric J. Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, and Christina A. Spaulding, Deputy State Public Defender, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No: S083594

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 5335 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOMMY ADRIAN TRUJEQUE,

  • May 28, 2015 | Texas Lawyer

    Houston Solo Prevails Twice in Novel Case

    Allen Isbell's recent victory on behalf of a criminal defense client proves what every good appellate lawyer knows—raise every issue possible on appeal because you never know w

    1 minute read

  • WEIZHONG ZHENG, Appellant v. VACATION NETWORK, INC. AND LINH C. DINH, Appellees

    Publication Date: 2015-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-05-28
    Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, HOUSTON
    Judge: John Donovan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-13-01136-CV

    COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, HOUSTONWEIZHONG ZHENG, Appellant v. VACATION NETWORK, INC. AND LINH C. DIN

  • May 28, 2015 | Texas Lawyer

    Houston Solo Prevails Twice in Novel Case

    Allen Isbell's recent victory on behalf of a criminal defense client proves what every good appellate lawyer knows: raise as many issues as possible, because you never know which one will stick.

    1 minute read

  • Doe v. USA, 14-MC-1412

    Publication Date: 2015-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge John Gleeson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Petitioner: Bernard H. Udell, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Respondent by: Bradley T. King, Kelly T. Currie Acting United States Attorney Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
    Case Number: 14-MC-1412

    Cite as: Doe v. USA, 14-MC-1412, NYLJ 1202727391939, at *1 (EDNY, Decided May 21, 2015) CASENAME Jane Doe, Petitioner v. United States of America, Respo

  • May 27, 2015 |

    Class Action Was Not Mooted by “Full Satisfaction” Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Made Before Class Certification Motion, Arkansas District Court Holds

    A federal district court in Arkansas, weighing in on a subject that has divided the U.S. Courts of Appeals, has ruled that an offer of judgment under…

    1 minute read