Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
27,694 results for 'K/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// court:"Court of Appeals"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
March 11, 2020 | New York Law Journal
New York custody determinations have always been based upon our public policy that courts should do what is in the best interest of the child. However, custody determinations have been subordinated to the right of biological parents to bring up their children as they see fit, absent interference from the state unless the child's best interests would be endangered. In his Law and the Family column, Joel R. Brandes discusses how public policy has been eroded in recent years to accommodate "increasingly varied familial relationships."
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2020-03-11
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Pauline Newman
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli, JR., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Shared Services, LLC also represented by Ginger Anders; David Lisson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLC, Menlo Park, CA; Steven Anzalone, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
for defendant: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Ronald Traud, Dominic L. Bianchi, Wayne W. Herrington.
Jeffrey A. Lamken, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Michael Gregory Pattillo, JR., Rayiner Hashem; Roderick George Dorman, McKool Smith PC, Los Angeles, CA; Joshua Wright Budwin, Joel Lance Thollander, Austin, TX; Douglas Aaron Cawley, Dallas, TX; John M. Whealan, Chevy Chase, MD.
Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellants ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., ARRIS Global Ltd., ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS International plc, ARRIS Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Pace Americas, LLC. Also represented by Joshua Hamilton Lee, Michael Turton; Matthew Meyer, Menlo Park, CA; Joshua B. Pond, Washington, DC.
Paul M. Bartkowski, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants Technicolor, S.A., Technicolor Connected Home USA LLC, Technicolor USA, Inc.
John Thorne, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Verizon Services Corp. Also represented by Gregory G. Rapawy, Ariela M. Migdal.
Case Number: 2018-1450
Comcast's X1 Boxes Infringed on Patents After Importation Contrary to Tariff Act §337
Publication Date: 2020-03-11
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Susan Carney
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Aviad Hack: Steven J. Errante, Lynch, Traub, Keefe, & Errante P.C., New Haven, CT.
for defendant: For Daniel Greer: David Grudberg, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, New Haven, CT.
Pro Se: Lawrence Dressler, New Haven, CT.
Case Number: 17-4923
Motive in Obtaining Video Not Accounted for, Privacy Interest Insufficiently Weighed
Publication Date: 2020-03-10
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Denny Chin
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Antonio Ponvert III, Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder, P.C., Bridgeport, Connecticut.
for defendant: For Interested Party-Appellee: Lawrence Dressler, pro se, New Haven, Connecticut.
For Defendants-Appellants: David T. Grudberg, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, New Haven, Connecticut.
For Appellant: Steven J. Errante, Lynch, Traub, Keefe & Errante P.C., New Haven, Connecticut.
Case Number: 17-4023-cv
$15 Million Damages Award Not 'Shocking'; Jury Instruction Accurately Stated the Law
March 9, 2020 | New York Law Journal
In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Karen Hoffman Lent and Kenneth Schwartz discuss the FTC's petition for certiorari currently pending at the Supreme Court relating to Ninth Circuit decisions concerning §13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2020-03-09
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:March 5, 2020
March 9, 2020 | Legaltech News
The sometimes fractured court came together Friday to draw a clear line between patent-eligible tech inventions and abstract ideas.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2020-03-09
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Criminal Court, Bronx
Judge: Judge Tara Collins
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: ADA Madeline Smith, Bronx County District Attorney's Office.
for defendant: For Defendant: Mr. Willoughby Jenett, Esq., The Legal Aid Society.
Case Number: 2019BX007394
People Not Obligated to Obtain Unsealing Order; Unsealing Ordered for In Camera Inspection
Publication Date: 2020-03-09
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Energy and Natural Resources
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Boyd
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0581
In 1975, respondents purchased an undivided two-thirds interest in a mineral lease.
Publication Date: 2020-03-09
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Civil Appeals | Health Care Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Stewart
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-10334
Appellant Hendrick Medical Center operates under the Medicare program and is located in the Abilene, Texas geographical region. Appellant challenged the wage index applied to it during the 2015 federal fiscal year.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
