• July 10, 2014 | The Recorder

    Ninth Circuit Upholds LCD Price-Fixing Convictions

    A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel upheld price-fixing convictions against Taiwanese electronics manufacturing company AU Optronics of America and two of its executives Thur

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Hsiung

    Publication Date: 2014-07-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-07-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Virginia M. Kendall, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristen C. Limarzi (argued), Peter K. Huston, Heather S. Tewksbury, E. Kate Patchen, Jon B. Jacobs, John J. Powers III, James J. Fredericks, and Adam D. Chandler, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.
    for defendant: Neal Kumar Katyal (argued), Christopher T. Handman, and Elizabeth Barchas Prelogar, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellant Hui Hsiung; Michael A. Attanasio (argued) and Jon F. Cieslak, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant, Hsuan Bin Chen; Dennis P. Riordan (argued) and Donald M. Horgan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, California, and Ted Sampsell-Jones, William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Defendants-Appellants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America; and John D. Cline, Law Office of John D. Cline, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellant AU Optronics Corporation America.

    Case Number: No. 12-10492 No. 12-10493 No. 12-10500 No. 12-10514

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7760 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUI

  • July 7, 2014 | National Law Journal

    IN BRIEF: Leaving Abu Dhabi

    Six years after it opened, Holland & Knight is closing its Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, office and exiting the Middle East. "In keeping with our strategic priorities, we are foc

    1 minute read

  • In Re Icenhower

    Publication Date: 2014-07-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-07-03
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris, N. Randy Smith, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ali M.M. Mojdehi (argued), Janet D. Gertz, Brian W. Byun, and Allison M. Rego, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Edward I. Silverman (argued), Sandler Lasry Laube Byer & Valdez LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant Alejandro Diaz-Barba.

    Case Number: No. 10-55933

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7535 IN THE MATTER OF: JERRY LEE ICENHOWER, etc., et al., Debtors, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, Plainti

  • July 2, 2014 | National Law Journal

    Cooley Law Suffers Setbacks Financially and in Court

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Wednesday affirmed a trial judge’s dismissal of a defamation lawsuit brought by the Thomas M. Cooley Law School against three plainti

    1 minute read

  • June 30, 2014 | National Law Journal

    Judge Tosses Defamation Suit Against Cooley Law

    A federal judge in New York has dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought against Thomas M. Cooley Law School by a plaintiffs attorney who helped spearhead a series of fraud class actions again

    1 minute read

  • In re Icenhower

    Publication Date: 2014-06-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-06-26
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris, N. Randy Smith, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Janet D. Gertz (argued) and Ali M.M. Mojdehi, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    for defendant: Edward I. Silverman (argued), Sandler, Lasry, Laube, Byer & Valdez, LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Alejandro Diaz-Barba. D. Anthony Gaston (argued), Law Offices of D. Anthony Gaston, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Martha Margarita Barba De La Torre.

    Case Number: No. 12-56329 No. 12-56329

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7158 IN RE: JERRY L. ICENHOWER, DBA Seaview Properties; DONNA L. ICENHOWER, Debtors, KISME

  • Luis M. v. Superior Court (People)

    Publication Date: 2014-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-06-19
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald L. Brown, Public Defender, Albert J. Menaster, Guillermo Arevalo-Farias and Rourke F. Stacey, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Steve Cooley and Jackie Lacey, District Attorneys, Brentford J. Ferreira, Phyllis Asayama, Roberta Schwartz and Cassandra Hart, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

    Case Number: No. S207314

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6739 LUIS M., a Minor, Petitioner, v THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGEL

  • Readylink Healthcare, Inc v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

    Publication Date: 2014-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-06-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Paul L. Friedman, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Seth A. Rafkin (argued) and Jennifer M. Bogue, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Paul D. Gifford, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Felix E. Leatherwood, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Brian D. Wesley (argued), Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellee Dave Jones, California Insurance Commissioner, in his official capacity.

    Case Number: No. 12-56248

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6452 READYLINK HEALTHCARE, INC., a Nevada Corporation, on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appel

  • June 12, 2014 |

    Home Ins. Co. v. American Home Products

     Home Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. American Home Products Corporation et al., Defendants75 N.Y.2d 196Court of Appeals of New York[No number in…

    1 minute read