Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
27,667 results for 'K////////// court:"Court of Appeals"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
July 19, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Two former U.K.-based traders convicted for their involvement in the London Interbank Offered Rate exchange scandal saw the Second Circuit toss their entire case Wednesday, including indictments.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2017-07-19
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-07-18
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Barry Carlton and James H. Flaherty III, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
for defendant: Patrick Morgan Ford for Defendant and Appellant.
Case Number: No. D069355
Prior booking statements inadmissible to prove gang affiliation (Dato, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-07-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Civil Court, Bronx County, Housing Part K
Judge: Judge Diane E. Lutwak
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Petitioner: Mahandra Persaud, Esq., Bronx, New York.
for defendant: Attorney for Respondent: Nicole Summers, Esq., The Bronx Defenders, Bronx, New York.
Case Number: L&T 26087/2017
Tenant's Challenge to Defective Verification Signed by Landlord's Agent Re
July 18, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer
The U.S. Supreme Court's recently concluded 2016-2017 term will most likely be remembered as the term in which the court largely avoided the limelight as it awaited the arrival of a ninth justice, who joined the court only in time for its final two-week oral argument session. Although the court did decide some high-profile cases, there were far fewer than in recent terms. That could be about to change, however, now that the court has returned to full strength.
1 minute read
July 18, 2017 | Daily Business Review
A Fort Lauderdale lawyer's ex-wife wanted to have his new spouse cover her court costs.
1 minute read
July 18, 2017 | New York Law Journal
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Lynn K. Neuner and William T. Russell Jr. write that at the end of last month, the Court of Appeals addressed once again the issue of adequate state funding for public education, dismissing plaintiffs' statewide challenges to the system, but permitting certain claims to proceed solely to the extent that they relate to circumstances in Syracuse and New York City.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-07-06
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth
Judge: KEM THOMPSON FROST, CHIEF JUSTICE
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 14-15-00586-CV
Appellant Fairfield Industries sells seismic data to oil companies under licensing agreements that prevent them from sharing the data with others. EP Energy and its predecessors purchased data for
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-06-29
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, First District
Judge: TERRY JENNINGS, JUSTICE
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01-15-00544-CV
Following an investigation under the Foreign Corporate Practices Act, appellant-corporation disclosed to its shareholders a possible adverse effect to its operations and financial conditions. Shortl
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area: Telecommunications | Civil Appeals
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Acosta, P.J., Richter, Andrias, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, appellant-respondent/respondent: Thomas J. Hall of counsel, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, and Rachel W. Thorn, Alan Levine and Caroline Pignatelli of counsel, Cooley LLP, New York. For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Carter G. Phillips of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.
for defendant: For the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Benjamin R. Nagin, Eamon P. Joyce, Kwaku A. Akowuah and Tobias S. Loss-Eaton of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, New York. For Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC, respondent-appellant/respondent: Stephen R. Neuwirth, Sanford I. Weisburst, Julia J. Peck and Cleland B. Welton II of counsel, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York. For the Office of Commissioner of Baseball and the Commissioner of Major League Baseball, respondents-appellants: Paul Clement of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, Erin E. Murphy of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Virginia, admitted pro hac vice, and Michael H. McGinley of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, John J. Buckley, Jr. of counsel, Williams & Connolly, New York, and Jonathan D. Lupkin of counsel, Lupkin and Associates, New York. For E. Leo Milonas, amicus curiae: David G. Keyko of counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, New York. For Diamond Dealers Club, Inc., amicus curiae: Stephen L. Ascher, Irene M. Ten Cate and Jeremy H. Ershow of counsel, Jenner Block LLP, New York. For Kenneth R. Feinberg, amicus curiae: Lawrence I. Ginsburg, Jay R. Fialkoff and Robert B. McFarlane of counsel, Moses & Singer LLP, New York. For Robert S. Smith, amicus curiae: Robert S. Smith, Robert J. Lack and Nora Bojar of counsel, Friedman Kaplan Seiler and Adelman, New York.
Case Number: 652044/14
Panel's Close Call on MLB-Network Dispute May Set Up Extra Legal I
July 17, 2017 | New York Law Journal
The suits were filed by independent publishers in response to the Second Circuit's earlier ruling that Apple and five publishing companies, all of whom were party to the current suit, had conspired when they simultaneously switched from a wholesale business model to an agency pricing model, but the court agreed that neither company could attribute its demise to the unlawful conspiracy.
1 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
