Filter This View

  • In re A.K.

    Publication Date: 2017-06-06
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-05-09
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robyn Truitt Drivon, County Counsel, and Lilly C. Frawley, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Lauren K. Johnson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant A.L.
    Case Number: No. C081545

    Relative caregiver exception to adoption not applicable to minor in stable foster care placement (Butz, J.)

  • IAR Systems Software, Inc. v. Superior Court (Shehayed)

    Publication Date: 2017-06-06
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Software
    Date Filed: 2017-06-05
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Petitioners, IAR Systems Software, Inc.: Antonio Valla, Michael Purcell, Valla & Associates, Inc.
    for defendant: Counsel for Real Parties in Interest, Nadim Shehayed: Thomas J. Nolan, Serenity Wang, Nolan Barton Bradford & Olmos LLP.
    Case Number: No. A149087

    Crime victim's attorneys not part of "prosecution team" for purposes of discovery under Brady (Jenkins, J.)

  • June 6, 2017 | New York Law Journal

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits Disgorgement Claims to Five Years

    Bill Maguire, Sarah Cave and Ken Katz discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's decision this week that resolved a circuit split over whether the five-year statute of limitations that applies to any "action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise," covers claims for disgorgement imposed as a sanction for violating a federal securities law.

    1 minute read

  • June 5, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Are Item 303 Omissions Actionable Under Rule 10b-5?

    During its October term this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in Leidos v. Indiana Public Retirement System, No. 16-581, on an important federal securities fraud issue: Whether a publicly held company's ­omission of "known trends and uncertainties" in its annual or interim reports, as required by Item 303 of Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-K, can give rise to a private securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (Rule 10-5).

    1 minute read

  • City of Galt v. Cohen (Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2017-06-05
    Practice Area: Government | Tax
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Date Filed: 2017-06-02
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Best Best & Krieger, Iris P. Yang, Kimberly E. Hood for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris and Xavier Becerra, Attorneys General, Douglas J. Woods, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mark R. Beckington, Susan K. Smith, and John W. Killeen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. C075897

    City's agreement with former redevelopment agency did not create enforceable obligations (Nicholson, Acting P.J.)

  • Edrei v. City ofNew York, 16 Civ. 1652

    Publication Date: 2017-06-05
    Practice Area: Mass Torts | Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert Sweet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs By: Gideon Orion Oliver, Esq., Elena L. Cohen, Esq., Michael Decker, Esq., New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendants By: Ashley Garman, Esq., Zachary Carter Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 16 Civ. 1652 (RWS)

  • Interest of C.R.-A.A., 04-16-00782-CV (4th COA. 05/24/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-06-05
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-05-24
    Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Judge: MARIALYN BARNARD, JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-16-00782-CV

    The Texas Department of Family Services became temporary managing conservator for C.R.-A.A., whose mother lived in Texas and whose father lived in Oklahoma. Father moved to place the child with him

  • Exxon v. Rincones, 15-0240 (TexApp Dist 05/26/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-06-05
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-05-26
    Court: Supreme Court of Texas
    Judge: JEFFREY V. BROWN, JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 15-0240

    Rincones was employed by WHM as a refinery technician, working at an Exxon facility. In April 2008, Rincones failed a drug test administered by a third-party testing company (DISA), which made him i

  • Al E.. v. Joann E

    Publication Date: 2017-06-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Part 5G
    Judge: Justice Jeffrey Sunshine
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff by: Philip L. Kamaras, Kamaras & Joseph, PLLC, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendant by: Jenifer J. Foley, Alter, Wolff & Foley LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: [Index Number Redacted by Court]

    Calculating Award of Maintenance Over Cap Is Not Calculated as Child S

  • Orange County Water District v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-06-02
    Practice Area: Environmental Law
    Industry: Manufacturing | State and Local Government
    Date Filed: 2017-06-01
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Connor, Fletcher & Hedenkamp, Edmond M. Connor, Douglas A. Hedenkamp; Miller & Axline, Duane C. Miller, Michael D. Axline and Justin Massey for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, R. Gaylord Smith, Malissa McKeith, Ernest Slome, Thomas Teschner and Brittany H. Bartold for Defendant and Respondent Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation.
    Case Number: No. D070771

    Water district may be able to recover some of future costs associated with groundwater protection program (Haller, J.)