Search Results

Microsoft v. United States, 14-2985

Publication Date: 2017-01-26
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Katzmann, C.J., Acobs, Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, Hall, Livingston, Chin, Lohier, Jr., Carney, Droney, C.JJ.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Microsoft Corporation: Robert M. Loeb and Brian P. Goldman, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY; Guy Petrillo, Petrillo Klein & Boxer LLP, New York, NY; James M. Garland and Alexander A. Berengaut, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC; Bradford L. Smith, David M. Howard, John Frank, Jonathan Palmer, and Nathaniel Jones, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA; on the brief, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
for defendant: For Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York: Serrin Turner, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, Justin Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, American Civil Liberties Union, The Constitution Project, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, in support of Appellant, Brett J. Williamson, David K. Lukmire, Nate Asher, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY; Faiza Patel, Michael Price, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY; Hanni Fakhoury, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Alex Abdo, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Apple, Inc., in support of Appellant: Kenneth M. Dreifach, Marc J. Zwillinger, Zwillgen PLLC, New York, NY and Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae BSA | The Software Alliance, Center for Democracy and Technology, Chamber of Commerce of the United States, The National Association of Manufacturers, and ACT | The App Association, in support of Appellant: Andrew J. Pincus, Paul W. Hughes, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Anthony J. Colangelo, in support of Appellant: Steven A. Engel, Dechert LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae AT&T Corp., Rackspace US, Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, i2 Coalition, and Application Developers Alliance, in support of Appellant: Alan C. Raul, Kwaku A. Akowuah, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Ireland: Peter D. Stergios, Charles D. Ray, McCarter & English, LLP, New York, NY and Hartford, CT. For Amici Curiae Amazon.com, Inc., and Accenture PLC, in support of Appellant: Peter Karanjia, Eric J. Feder, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Verizon Communications, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., eBay Inc., Salesforce.com, Inc., and Infor, in support of Appellant: Michael Vatis, Jeffrey A. Novack, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY; Randal S. Milch, Verizon Communications Inc., New York, NY; Kristofor T. Henning, Hewlett-Packard Co., Wayne, PA; Amy Weaver, Daniel Reed, Salesforce.com, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Orin Snyder, Thomas G. Hungar, Alexander H. Southwell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Mark Chandler, Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; Aaron Johnson, eBay Inc., San Jose, CA. For Amici Curiae Media Organizations, in support of Appellant: Laura R. Handman, Alison Schary, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae Computer and Data Science Experts, in support of Appellant: Philip Warrick, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Digital Rights Ireland Limited, National Council for Civil Liberties, and The Open Rights Group, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY; Edward McGarr, Simon McGarr, Dervila McGirr, McGarr Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland.
Case Number: 14-2985

Cite as: Microsoft v. US, 14-2985, NYLJ 1202777615376, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 24, 2017)CASE NAMEMicrosoft Corporation, Appellant v. United States of Am

Flood v. Just Energy Marketing Corp., 7:15-cv-2012

Publication Date: 2017-01-26
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Katherine Forrest
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 7:15-cv-2012

Cite as: Flood v. Just Marketing Corp., 7:15-cv-2012, NYLJ 1202777603778, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 20, 2017) CASENAME Kevin Flood, Plaintiff v. Just

Adams v. State

Publication Date: 2017-01-25
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jacob Rhein Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Rebecca A. Wright, District Attorney, and Joshua Smith District Attorney's Office, Augusta, for appellee.
Case Number: A16A1583

Evidence that mother left her two young children asleep at home alone for less than an hour—without more—was insufficient to support her convictions on two counts of contributing to the deprivation

Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. Stockton East Water District

Publication Date: 2017-01-25
Practice Area: Energy and Natural Resources
Industry:
Date Filed: 2016-12-27
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Downey Brand, M. Max Steinheimer, David R.E. Aladjem, Anthony L. Vignolo, Amanda Pearson; and Reid Roberts for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.
for defendant: Herum\Crabtree, Herum\Crabtree\Suntag, Jeanne M. Zolezzi, Alexis K. Stevens, and William R. Carlson for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.
Case Number: No. C072218

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 807 CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Responden

In re Yolanda L.

Publication Date: 2017-01-25
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-01-24
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary C. Wickham, County Counsel, R. Keith Davis, Assistant County Counsel and Jacklyn K. Louie, Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent.
for defendant: Landon Villavaso, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Case Number: No. B271130

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 717 In re YOLANDA L. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTM

In re Carl H.

Publication Date: 2017-01-25
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-01-23
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy Sugerman, Office of the City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent, San Francisco Human Services Agency.
for defendant: Linda J. Harvie, First District Appellate Project, for Defendant and Appellant, N.B.
Case Number: No. A147220 No. A147335

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 708 In re CARL H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN SERVICES A

January 25, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Vicarious Liability for Judiciary Law §487 Violations

Violating New York Judiciary Law §487 can be memorably costly for an errant attorney. Significant penalties can ensue, both the criminal and the civil kind. Section 487 not only codi

1 minute read

January 25, 2017 | Law Journal Newsletters

Injunction of the DOL's Overtime Rule and Its Appeal

Is the Department of Labor overtime rule now dead? Will the overtime rule be modified to a more modest version? Much uncertainty remains regarding the recently announced overtime rule in both the legal and the political sphere.

1 minute read

January 25, 2017 |

Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Smithv.State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.2017 WL 117178NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED…

1 minute read

In re J.G.

Publication Date: 2017-01-24
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Date Filed: 2017-01-24
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Brook A. Bennigson, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
for defendant: William C. Whaley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Case Number: No. C077056

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 670 In re J.G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respon