Filter This View

  • Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Inc. v. Hogue

    Publication Date: 2008-09-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-29
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: J. Dale Wainwright Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-0575

    Argued April 12, 2005JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE O'NEILL, JUSTICE BRISTER, JUSTICE MEDINA, JUSTICE JOHNSON, and JUSTICE WILLETT

  • People v Allen

    Publication Date: 2008-01-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00126

    Decided on January 15, 2008 No. 48 SSM 33 [*1]The People & c., Respondent, v Hector Frazier, Appellant. Submitted by Lynn W.

  • March 13, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Settlement Ends $300 Million Tug-of-War over Frozen Stanford Funds

    More than four years after the global entrepreneur R. Allen Stanford was exposed as a Ponzi schemer and Stanford assets were put in receivership, thousands of investors who bought Stanford's

    1 minute read

  • March 22, 2010 | The Recorder

    Wilson v. Superior Court (People)

    C.A. 2nd B216212 The Second Appellate District granted a petition for writ of mandate. The court held that a defendant in commitment proceedings under the Sexually Violent Predators Act

    1 minute read

  • May 25, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    'Who's on First' for R. Allen Stanford? Financier Battles Insurers Solo over Attorney Fees

    If there was ever someone who could use a good lawyer, it's R. Allen Stanford, the disgraced financier charged with orchestrating a $7 billion swindle through Stanford International Bank Ltd. b

    1 minute read

  • United States of America v. Mark Allen Youngs

    Publication Date: 2012-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-23
    Court: 2d Cir.
    Judge: Droney, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-4501-cr

    10-4501-cr United States v. Youngs Argued: March 23, 2012 28 Before: LIVINGSTON, LYNCH, and DRONEY, Circuit Judges. 30 Appeal from a conviction for production and

  • DiGeronimo v. Fuchs, 101540/06

    Publication Date: 2011-08-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Richmond County, DCM Part 3, 4 & 5
    Judge: Justice Joseph J. Maltese
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented by Joseph Lichtenstein, P.C.
    for defendant: Defendant Allen Fuchs, M.D. is represented by the law firm of Amabile & Erman, P.C. Defendant Staten Island University Hospital is represented by the law firm of Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP.
    Case Number: 101540/06

    Cite as: DiGeronimo v. Fuchs, 101540/06, NYLJ 1202510631302, at *1 (Sup., RI, Decided August 4, 2011)Justice Joseph J. MalteseDecid

  • People v Harper

    Publication Date: 2006-11-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 187 SSM 34

    Decided on November 20, 2006 No. 187 SSM 34 [*1]The People & c., Re

  • Correll v. Ryan

    Publication Date: 2008-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-14
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas Phalen and Jon M. Sands, Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellant.
    for defendant: James P. Beene, Kent E. Cattani, and Terry Goddard, Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellee.
    Case Number: 03-99006

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5718MICHAEL EMERSON CORRELL, Petitioner-Appellant,v.CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Acting Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director,

  • Matter of Gary Waldren v Town of Islip

    Publication Date: 2005-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 200 SSM 30

    Decided on December 20, 2005 No. 200 SSM 30 [*1]In the Matter of Gary Waldren, Respondent, v Town of Islip, Appellant. Submitted