Filter This View

  • A.B. v. K.R.K.Y.

    Publication Date: 2019-06-17
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Carbon County
    Judge: Judge Nanovic
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 19-0630

    The court granted mother primary custody of the parties' three children, continuing an arrangement that father had agreed to, given the lack of evidence that mother disparaged father's faith and that the children had been well taken care of under the existing arrangement. The trial court granted mother primary custody.

  • In the Interest of: K.M.R.

    Publication Date: 2019-06-10
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Hodge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 19-0589

    There is no statutory requirement or state precedent requiring that the testimony or preference of a child be placed on the record as an integral part of a termination proceeding and thus no support for parents' argument that their children were withheld from the court and barred from testifying in violation of the Child Protective Services Laws. The trial court recommended affirmance.

  • In the Interest of K.M.R. & J.L.A.

    Publication Date: 2019-04-01
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Hodge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 19-0311

    Clear and convincing evidence supported the termination of parental rights in this case, and the court did not err in failing to require the children to be present at the involuntary termination hearings.

  • In the Interest of K.M.R. & J.L.A.

    Publication Date: 2018-12-04
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Family Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Hodge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-1410

    In this juvenile dependency proceeding, the court did not commit any error with regard to the children's testimony, and mother failed to show she met the requirements of the reunification plan.

  • K.C. Auto Body, Inc. v. Brice

    Publication Date: 2018-10-30
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Berks County
    Judge: Judge Sprecher
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-1282

    The plaintiff company's conversion, fraud, misrepresentation and replevin claims against its former owner failed where the evidence established that defendant purchased the subject vehicle when he was sole owner and chief executive officer of the company and that he acted with the reasonable belief that he was the rightful owner of the car. The court entered judgment for defendant.

  • Brice v. K.C. Auto Body, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-09-25
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Berks County
    Judge: Judge Sprecher
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-1088

    The court disregarded an irregularity in the pleadings and held that plaintiffs were entitled to a partition, because the facts of property ownership were already established in a recent trial involving related issues between the parties.