Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
436 results for 'K/////// court:"Delaware Court of Chancery"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
September 29, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer
Two Third Circuit nominees and four nominees to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania advanced out of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
2 minute read
June 29, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider
In "pro-sandbagging" states, a buyer's pre-closing knowledge of a breach does not prevent her from bringing a successful claim for breach of warranty. In "anti-sandbagging" states, a buyer who knew (or should have known) that the warranty was untrue is barred from recovering on a claim for breach.
7 minute read
June 3, 2022 | Litigation Daily
Our first runners-up this week at Bracewell won a whopping $1.6 billion in damages in a breach of contract suit against IBM Corp.
4 minute read
March 14, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer
The Legal Intelligencer congratulates the new class of partners for 2022.
42 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-02-07
Practice Area: Trade Secrets
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Martin P. Russo, Robert Sidorsky, Sarah Y. Khurana, Russo PLLC, New York, New York.
for defendant: Andrew J. Goodman, Malcolm Seymour, Foster Garvey, P.C., New York, New York.
For the Defendants: Aaron Marks, Kara Cheever, Farryal Siddiqui, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, New York.
Kristin Rose, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
Case Number: 19cv3283
Company Fails to Show Defendant Misappropriated Trade Secrets
January 26, 2022 | Litigation Daily
In a year where transactional practices got a lot of the shine in large law firms, full-time litigators made up 40% of the magazine's top 25 lateral hires of 2021. Another couple of lawyers who spend part of their time on litigation also made the list.
6 minute read
December 15, 2021 | Delaware Business Court Insider
While parties may discuss the terms of a business arrangement, absent definite agreement on all material terms or a definite promise, these arrangements are generally unenforceable.
4 minute read
November 16, 2021 | Insurance Coverage Law Center
On Oct. 5, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order narrowly construing the bump-up exclusion in favor of the insured in a dispute related to the merger of two leading insurance brokers, Towers Watson and Willis.
32 minute read
October 20, 2021 | Delaware Business Court Insider
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion applied an exception to the general rule that Delaware courts will often exercise their discretion to dismiss or stay a Delaware action in favor of a first-filed action between the parties that is pending in another jurisdiction.
6 minute read
Publication Date: 2021-10-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel E. Ross, Bradley R. Aronstam, Ross Aronstam & Moritz, Wilmington, DE; Joshua S. Amsel, Matthew R. Friedenberg, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Joseph H. Huston, Jr., Stevens & Lee P.C., Wilmington, DE; Robert K. Keach, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, ME for receiver. Ryan P. Newell, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for nominal defendants.
Case Number: D69561
Claimant was entitled to indemnification of his litigation expenses, and the court granted his motion to intervene because he had a valid property interest which was not adequately protected by existing parties.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
