Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
398 results for 'K////////// court:"Delaware Supreme Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-09-01
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Legal Services | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Vaughn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick K. Gibson, Ippoliti Law Group, Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: Carol A. Vanderwoude, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Art C. Aranilla, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: D69520
Former clients sufficiently pled legal malpractice cause of action by alleging that legal counsel negligently advised clients to pursue litigation strategy that had no merit, resulting in clients incurring unnecessary litigation expense.
Publication Date: 2021-07-21
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Max B. Walton, Kyle Evans Gay, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael K. Ross, Thomas Shakow, Serine Consolino, Sean Roberts, Aegis Law Group LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Stephen B. Brauerman, Elizabeth A. Powers, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Deborah B. Baum, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D69471
Chancery court erred in ruling that stock sale to break shareholder deadlock and avoid shareholder's action for appointment of a custodian for the company was permissible if the stock was sold at a fair price, as the company and its board and other shareholder were obligated to demonstrate a compelling justification for conducting the sale.
Publication Date: 2021-06-16
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Melanie K. Sharp, Martin S. Lessner, Mary F. Dugan, Michael A. Laukaitis II, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki, Benjamin P. Chapple, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sara A. Lima, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D69437
Where defendant made a particularized showing regarding an improper purpose in connection with an agency's issuance of a governmental subpoena, the court was entitled to request further submissions before deciding the matter.
June 1, 2021 | The American Lawyer
"In addition to belonging to legal practice areas, our litigators are aligned to our firm's industry groups. This industry focus is not a new focus for us. We have been focused on our clients' industries for more than 20 years."
17 minute read
June 1, 2021 | Delaware Business Court Insider
"In addition to belonging to legal practice areas, our litigators are aligned to our firm's industry groups. This industry focus is not a new focus for us. We have been focused on our clients' industries for more than 20 years."
17 minute read
June 1, 2021 | Litigation Daily
"In addition to belonging to legal practice areas, our litigators are aligned to our firm's industry groups. This industry focus is not a new focus for us. We have been focused on our clients' industries for more than 20 years."
17 minute read
Publication Date: 2021-02-10
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven L. Caponi, K&L Gates, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Roger R. Crane, Thomas A. Warns, K&L Gates, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Steven T. Margolin, Samuel L. Moultrie, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hal S. Shaftel, Obiamaka P. Madubuko, Daniel Friedman, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69292
The trial court properly ordered a new trial on quantum meruit damages, but it abused its discretion in or-dering a new trial regarding damages for fraud, because plaintiff presented a unified theory of recovery which did not support an independent basis for awarding fraud damages.
January 20, 2021 | Delaware Business Court Insider
This is the 16th year that Francis G.X. Pileggi has published an annual list of key corporate and commercial decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court and the Delaware Court of Chancery.
1 minute read
December 16, 2020 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a stockholder to inspect corporate books and records for a "proper purpose" reasonably related to her interests as a stockholder.
1 minute read
December 9, 2020 | New York Law Journal
State court enforcement of exclusive federal forum provisions for 1933 Act claims is the final step to issuers and other participants in securities offerings subject to the 1933 Act curbing duplicative state court litigation, and recent California decisions provide important guidance toward that objective.
1 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
