Filter This View

  • Virginia Properties v. T-Mobile, 16‐2973

    Publication Date: 2017-08-02
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Constitutional Law
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom | Construction
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Calabresi, Pooler, C.JJ., and Vilardo, D.J.1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff‐Appellant Virginia Properties, LLC: Seth L. Levine, Christos G. Papapetrou, on the brief, Kenneth E. Lee, Levine Lee LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant‐Appellee T‐Mobile Northeast LLC: Darren W. Johnson, on the brief, Roberta Kaplan, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY. Also on the brief: Daniel C. Folchetti, Law Office of Lori D. Fishman, Tarrytown, NY, for Third‐Party Defendants‐ Cross‐Defendants‐Cross‐Claimants‐Appellees Innovative Engineering, Inc.; Patrick W. Brophy, McMahon, Martine & Gallagher, LLP, Brooklyn, NY, for Third‐Party Defendants‐Cross‐Defendants‐Cross‐Claimants‐Appellees Skyline Steel Fabricators & Erectors, Inc. For Appellee KMB Design Group, LLC: Joyce E. Boyle, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 16‐2973

    Second Circuit Junks $700K Sanctions Order Against Pla

  • August 1, 2017 | National Law Journal

    Most Memorable Footnote? Here's What a Few Lawyers Told Us.

    A federal agency brief that a Washington judge threw out recently might be memorable for what the court called "excessive" footnotes—48 of them, stretching hundreds of lines. We asked a few veteran U.S. Supreme Court and appellate lawyers to share the footnotes that, for them, have stood the test of time.

    1 minute read

  • Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Superior Court (Prime Healthcare La Palma, LLC)

    Publication Date: 2017-08-01
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Dispute Resolution | Civil Procedure | Health Care Law
    Industry: Health Care | Insurance
    Date Filed: 2017-07-31
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Gregory N. Pimstone and Joanna S. McCallum for Petitioners.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent.King & Spalding, Marcia Augsburger and W. Scott Cameron for Real Parties in Interest.
    Case Number: No. B272284

    Trial court lacked jurisdiction to confirm partial arbitration award (Small, J.)

  • International v. Lufkin, 12-15-00223-CV (TexApp Dist 07/12/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-07-12
    Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth
    Judge: JAMES T. WORTHEN, CHIEF JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12-15-00223-CV

    Manufacturer Lufkin Industries purchased the Express Solution, a software package for business operations, from appellant IBM. However, several tests of the software failed, pushing back the impleme

  • August 1, 2017 |

    Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. v. Monaco

    Click Here for FC&S Expert Legal AnalysisProgressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. MonacoUnited States District Court for the District of ConnecticutJuly 5, 2017,…

    1 minute read

  • July 31, 2017 | New York Law Journal

    USA v. Huertas

    Suppression's Denial Upheld; Defendant Never Submitted to Police Authority, Was Never Seized

    1 minute read

  • USA v. Huertas, 15-4014

    Publication Date: 2017-07-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Jacobs, and Pooler, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: with Marc H. Silverman, on the brief, Alina P. Reynolds, for Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, CT.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: Jennifer Mellon, for Terence S. Ward, Federal Defender, District of Connecticut, New Haven, CT.
    Case Number: 15-4014

    Suppression's Denial Upheld; Defendant Never Submitted to Police Authority, Was Never

  • Cavin v. Abbott, 03-16-00395-CV (TexApp Dist 07/14/2017)

    Publication Date: 2017-07-28
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2017-07-14
    Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District
    Judge: DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-16-00395-CV

    App , husband and wife, filed suit against wife's parents, appellants, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief following numerous attempts by appellants to interrupt their union. Ap

  • July 27, 2017 | New York Law Journal

    Partner Buy-Outs

    In his Law Firm Partnership Law column, Arthur J. Ciampi discusses a Ninth Circuit decision that presents a number of useful criteria to apply in determining a "shareholder's" or "partner's" status and provides insight into the nature of transitions from equity to non-equity positions and the ramifications of such transitions for both the law partner and the law firm.

    1 minute read

  • FilmOn.com v. DoubleVerify, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-07-26
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Date Filed: 2017-06-29
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Baker Marquart, Ryan G. Baker, Jaime W. Marquart, Christian A. Anstett and Blake D. McCay for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Fox Rothschild, Lincoln D. Bandlow and Margo J. Arnold for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B264074

    Presence of adult content and copyright infringing material on websites constituted matters of widespread public interest (Johnson, J.)