Filter This View

  • Lee E. Johnson, Joey Marie Kelly, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Priceline.Com, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, 12-1744-cv

    Publication Date: 2013-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Cabranes and Raggi, C..JJ., and Rakoff, DJ.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Matthew S. Hirsch, Hirsch Law LLC, Trumbull, Connecticut, on the brief, Howard B. Stravitz, University of South Carolina Law Center, Columbia, South Carolina.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Matthew E. Smith, on the brief, Thomas D. Goldberg, Day Pitney LLP, Stamford, Connecticut. For Amicus Curiae New England Legal Foundation, in support of Defendant-Appellee: Kirk D. Tavtigian, Law Offices of Kirk D. Tavtigian LLC, Avon, Connecticut; John Pagliaro, Martin J. Newhouse, of Counsel, New England Legal Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Case Number: 12-1744-cv

    Cite as: Johnson v. Priceline.Com, Inc., 12-1744-cv, NYLJ 1202594268628, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided March 27, 2013)Before: Cabranes and Raggi, C..JJ., and Ra

  • August 21, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Opinions Approved for Publication

    STATE COURT CASES CIVIL PROCEDURE � ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 07-2-4824 Singh, et al. v. Sidana, App. Div. (Kestin, P.J.A.D.) (10 pp.) The plain language of N.J.S

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Betancourth

    Publication Date: 2009-01-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-01-13
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Cox, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-14710

    [PUBLISH]Before WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges, and ALBRITTON,*fn1 District Judge.In this appeal, we consider whether a defendant who has entered an uncondition

  • Jones v. Vilsack

    Publication Date: 2001-12-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-05
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: BYE, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 01-2312

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BYE, Circuit Judge.Iowa's Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Act (Control Act) prohibitsretailers from giving away

  • In re Krebs

    Publication Date: 2008-05-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-19
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-2959

    PRECEDENTIALArgued March 6, 2008Before: FISHER, GREENBERG and ROTH, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTThis appeal requires us to revisit one of our precedents in deciding whether a debtor

  • United States of America v. Carlos Quinones

    Publication Date: 2012-02-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-01
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-4318-cr

    10-4318-crUnited States v. QuinonesSUMMARY ORDERRulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and

  • August 21, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Brightening the Court's Dark Corners

    The U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in Bright v. Westmoreland County, 443 F.3d 276 (3d Cir. April 4, 2006) is a welcome clarification of the substantive due process

    1 minute read

  • Franke v. Poly-America Medical and Dental Benefits Plan

    Publication Date: 2009-02-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-05
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Wollman, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-1637

    Submitted: November 14, 2008Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.Poly-America Medical and Dental Benefits Plan (the Plan) appeals from the district court's denial of its motion to co

  • April 10, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Computer Law

    It is widely recognized that the Internet has made access to pornography much easier than at any time in history. While the First Amendment protects the rights of adults to view such material,

    1 minute read

  • July 31, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Clarifies Inconsistency In State-Created Danger Doctrine

    The 3rd U.D. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in Bright v. Westmoreland County (April 4, 2006) is a welcome clarification of the substantive due process doctrine of "stat

    1 minute read