Filter This View

  • March 11, 2011 | Bloomberg

    Rajaratnam's lawyer: U.S. 'has it wrong'

    Raj Rajaratnam, co-founder of the Galleon Group LLC hedge fund, relied on newspaper articles, research reports and his company's own analysis for information to make stock trades, not insider

    1 minute read

  • State of West Virginia v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

    Publication Date: 2002-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-07
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Traxler, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-1443

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 31, 2001Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Traxler wrote the opinion, in which Judge Williams and Judge Howard joined.OPINIONThe State of West Virginia brought t

  • March 19, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Google, Quinn Emanuel Improve to 3-0 This Year in East Texas

    If Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Charles Verhoeven spends any more time litigating patent cases for Google in East Texas, he will qualify as his own local counsel. As we r

    1 minute read

  • Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, 07-CV-6304

    Publication Date: 2013-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Kenneth Karas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Paul Savad, Esq., Susan E. Cooper, Esq., Laura M. Feigenbaum, Esq., Savad Churgin, Attorneys at Law Nanuet, New York. Counsel for Plaintiffs: Roman P. Storzer, Esq., Robert L. Greene, Esq., Storzer & Greene, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C. Counsel for Plaintiffs: John G. Stepanovich, Esq., Lentz, Stepanovich & Bergethon, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Joseph L. Clasen, Esq., William J. Kelleher, III, Esq., Samantha L.H. Cassetta, Esq., Robinson & Cole LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for Defendants: Marci A. Hamilton, Esq., The Law Office of Marci Hamilton, Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania.
    Case Number: 07-CV-6304

    Cite as: Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, 07-CV-6304, NYLJ 1202584002615, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 4, 2013)Dist

  • March 30, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    A New Approach to Evaluating Joint Employment Under Federal Law

    In its recent decision in Ling Nan Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Co., 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26528 (Dec. 30, 2003), the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals fashioned a new standard for identifyi

    1 minute read

  • In re: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al., Debtor, 11-CV-1338 (CS)

    Publication Date: 2011-11-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Cathy Seibel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Co-Counsel for Appellants Long Island Lighting Company, et al.: Elisa M. Pugliese, Cullen and Dykman LLP, Brooklyn, NY. Co-Counsel for Appellants Long Island Lighting Company, et al., Co-Counsel for Appellants Jersey Central Power & Light Company, et al.: Russell R. Johnson III, John M. Craig, Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC, Manakin-Sabot, Virginia. Co-Counsel for Appellants Jersey Central Power & Light Company, et al.: Thomas R. Slome Jessica G. Berman, Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. Garden City, NY. Counsel for Appellants Potomac Electric Power Company, et al., Counsel for Appellant Washington Gas Light Company: William Douglas White, McCarthy & White, PLLC, McLean, Virginia Counsel for Appellees The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al.: Andrew M. Genser, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-CV-1338 (CS)

    Cite as: In re: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 11-CV-1338 (CS), NYLJ 1202532983637, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 14, 2011)District Judge Cathy

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

    Publication Date: 2002-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Ginsburg
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-131

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)This case concerns the fees that may be awarded attorneys who successfully represent Social Security benefits claimants in court. Under 42 U. S. C. �406(b) (1994 ed. and Supp.

  • Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Farris

    Publication Date: 2008-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-09
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Sutton, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 07-5397/5424

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: March 12, 2008Before: DAUGHTREY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; POLSTER, District Judge.

  • March 14, 2005 | National Law Journal

    CIVIL PRACTICE | Anti-injunction law exception explained

    A Connecticut federal court had the authority to issue an injunction stopping a man from repeatedly relitigating in another jurisdiction his claim that his parental rights were invalidly

    1 minute read

  • November 1, 2007 |

    When A Delay Can Kill

    Should inter partes reexamination of a patent at the Patent and Trademark Office be allowed to put a brake on ongoing litigation? That's the question facing federal district court judge Gregory Sl

    1 minute read