Filter This View

  • In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293

    Publication Date: 2012-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Jason Allen Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Steve W. Berman, George W. Sampson, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Seattle), Seattle, WA. Jeff D. Friedman, Shana Scarlett, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (CA), Berkely, CA. Kit A. Pierson, Emmy L. Levens, Jeffrey B. Dubner, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (DC), Washington, DC. John Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant Apple, Inc.: Daniel S. Floyd, Daniel G. Swanson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA. For Defendant HarperCollins Publishers LLC: Shepard Goldfein, Clifford H. Aronson, Paul M. Eckles, C. Scott Lent, Matthew M. Martino, Skadden, Armps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants Hachette Book Group, Inc. and Hachette Digital, Inc.: Walter B. Stuart, Samuel J. Rubin, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan: Joel M. Mitnick, Alexandra Shear, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant Penguin Group (USA), Inc.: Daniel Ferrel McInnis, David A. Donohoe, Allison Sheedy, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C. For Defendants Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.: James W. Quinn, Yehudah L. Buchweitz, Weil, Gotshal, & Manges LLP, New York, NY. Helene D. Jaffee, Proskauer Rose LLP, Eleven Times Square, New York, NY. Martha E. Gifford, Law Office of Martha E. Gifford, Brooklyn, NY. *1
    Case Number: 11 MD 2293

    Cite as: In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293, NYLJ 1202554340567, at *1 (SDNY, Decided May 15, 2012)District Judge Denise Cotep

  • July 23, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Antitrust

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent price-squeeze opinion, a monopoly leveraging claim could not be asserted by purchasers of HIV

    1 minute read

  • December 7, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 12, No. 235 � December 7, 2004

    STATE COURT CASES EDUCATION � LOCAL BOARDS � CHARITABLE IMMUNITY16-2-8589 Tonelli, etc. v. Board of Education of . . . Wyckoff, et al., App. Div. (We

    1 minute read

  • Reino de Espana v. American Bureau of Shipping

    Publication Date: 2005-08-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Magistrate Judge Ellis I. INTRODUCTION On or about November 19, 2002, the Prestige, a Bahamian-flagged oil t

  • In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92

    Publication Date: 2008-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-13
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21 MC 92

    District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee: Stanley

  • Darnell Greathouse, Plaintiff v. JHS Security Inc., Melvin Wilcox, Defendants, 11 Civ. 7845

    Publication Date: 2012-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Paul Engelmayer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 7845

    Cite as: Greathouse v. JHS Security Inc., 11 Civ. 7845, NYLJ 1202576304160, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 19, 2012)District Judge Paul Engelmayerp cla

  • People v. Hugo Gutierrez et al.

    Publication Date: 2005-06-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NASSAU COUNTY District Court Judge Kluewer DECISION AFTER HEARING Defendant's joint application to suppress tangible evidence retrieved from a car in which e

  • United States Liability Ins. Co. v. Mountain Valley Indemnity Co.

    Publication Date: 2005-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Haight In this diversity action, plaintiffs United States Liability Insurance Co. ("U.S. Liability"), and Mobil

  • February 19, 2003 | The Recorder

    California Court Lays Out Law on Clergy Sex Abuse Claims

    Clergymen tempted to have sexual affairs with members of their congregations should beware: They might be liable.On Friday, San Francisco's 1st District Court of Appeal ruled that unde

    1 minute read

  • July 15, 2003 | National Law Journal

    Fight Over 'Privilege' Heats Up

    Attacking the attorney-client privilege, once a rare legal tactic, has become a standard tool of government lawyers these days and a cause for increasing concern among corporate defense attorn

    1 minute read