Filter This View

  • May 11, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible

    Layoffs Hit T&K On May 5, Thompson & Knight laid off for economic reasons 17 lawyers and 25 support staff in all of its U.S. offices, including Dallas,

    1 minute read

  • July 30, 2007 | The American Lawyer

    Vick Assembles High-Profile Legal Team

    Fans of Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick say he has never had enough premier players around him. That was not the case Thursday, when legal proceedings began against him begin in a fed

    1 minute read

  • May 18, 2004 | Legal Times

    Military Justice Is Put On Trial In Iraq Abuse Scandal

    WASHINGTON -- As the first prosecution related to the abuse of detainees in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison gets under way Wednesday, the Pentagon desperately needs to demonstrate to Iraqis and the i

    1 minute read

  • Meng-Lin Liu v. Siemens, 13 Civ. 317

    Publication Date: 2013-10-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley III
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: David N. Mair, Esq., Kaiser Saurborn & Mair, P.C., New York, NY. Eric C. Liebeler, Esq., Siemens Corporation, Washington, DC.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendant: Brant W. Bishop, Esq., Ragan Naresh, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.
    Case Number: 13 Civ. 317

    Cite as: Meng-Lin Liu v. Siemens, 13 Civ. 317, NYLJ 1202624768173, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 21, 2013) 13 Civ. 317 District Judge William H. Pa

  • Grimaldi v Guinn

    Publication Date: 2010-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2008-07211

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. MARK C. DILLON JOSEPH COVELLO THOMAS A. DIC

  • Roberts v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-06-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Leslie B. Yates Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-08-00596-CR

    Affirmed and Opinion filed June 10, 2010.OPINIONAppellant Christopher Roberts was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment. In four issues, ap

  • October 25, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    'CFTC v. Walsh': Finality of the Marriage, Yet No Justice for Financial Victims

    In Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Walsh (CFTC), /a

    1 minute read

  • March 14, 2008 | Texas Lawyer

    Court Sides With McGinnis, Lochridge in Disqualification Dispute

    It took Austin's 3rd Court of Appeals about a week to deny a petition for writ of mandamus sought by a physician-owned partnership to disqualify the firm defending another firm that the partne

    1 minute read

  • In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293

    Publication Date: 2012-07-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Kit A. Pierson, Emmy L. Levens, Jeffrey B. Dubner, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (DC), Washington, DC. For Plaintiffs: John Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY. For Plaintiffs: George W. Sampson, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (Seattle), Seattle, WA. For Plaintiffs: Jeff D. Friedman, Shana Scarlett, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (CA), Berkely, CA. For Plaintiffs: Jason Allen Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (NYC), New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant Penguin Group (USA), Inc.: Daniel Ferrel McLnnis, David A. Donohoe, Allison Sheedy, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 11 MD 2293

    Cite as: In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, 11 MD 2293, NYLJ 1202561611247, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 27, 2012)District Judge Denise Cotep

  • August 24, 2010 |

    Privacy Policies in the Electronic Workplace

    Embodying some of the aspects of Big Brother is not a new role for an employer. Traditional concerns for employers have included: loss of information sensitive to the employer or to employees; hara

    1 minute read