Filter This View

  • Wurtzel v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

    Publication Date: 2003-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Platt WURTZEL v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CO. — Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company (“Starbucks” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b)

  • Larson v. Family Violence and Sexual Assault Prevention Center of South Texas

    Publication Date: 2001-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-29
    Court: Tx. App. Dist.13
    Judge: Nelda V. Rodriguez Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NUMBER 13-00-093

    On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.OPINIONOpinion by Justice RodriguezAppellant, Sandra Larson, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her causes of action aga

  • Warren Lee Hill, Jr v. Carl Humphrey

    Publication Date: 2011-11-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-22
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Hull, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-15444

    [PUBLISH]U.S. COURT OF APPEALSELEVENTH CIRCUITJOHN LEY CLERK(November 22, 2011)Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN

  • June 13, 2007 | The American Lawyer

    Arbitration Scorecard 2007: Top 50 Treaty Disputes

    Hulley Enterprises, Ltd. (Cyprus), Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man), and Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. The Russian FederationAd hoc (UNCITRAL; administered by the Permanent

    1 minute read

  • February 1, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    Groupon IPO After months of drama, Groupon, Inc., completed its initial public offering on November 3 and saw its stock rise by almost 40 percent, from an offering price of $20 pe

    1 minute read

  • January 19, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    News in Brief

    Counties To Assemble Malpractice Lawsuit DataHarrisburg — The state Supreme Court's chief justice wants local court officials across the state to report the number of medical malpracti

    1 minute read

  • In re Darryl C., 6253

    Publication Date: 2012-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, and Román, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellant: Raymond E. Rogers of counsel, Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York. For Presentment Agency: Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel, Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 6253

    Cite as: In re Darryl C., 6253, NYLJ 1202561157303, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided June 26, 2012)Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Abdus-Sal

  • October 1, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    AB INBEVMODELOAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV agreed on June 29 to pay $20.1 billion in cash for the 50 percent of Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo S.A.B. de

    1 minute read

  • December 11, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    Amended Brief

    In The Supreme Court of TexasMINH THU TRAN, NORMAN L. ROSER f

    1 minute read

  • Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-19
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Appellants: Hennefer, Finley & Wood and James A. Hennefer Blecher & Collins and Maxwell M. Blecher and Jordan L. Ludwig Green & Noblin and Robert S. Green and James Robert Noblin
    for defendant: Attorneys for Respondent Ernst & Young LLP: Latham & Watkins and Peter A. Wald, David M. Friedman, Lori Alvino McGill, Roman Martinez and Patrick E. Gibbs Attorneys for Respondents Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay TEMIC Semiconductor Acquisition Holdings Corp., and Estate of Felix D. Zandman: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel and Alan R. Friedman, Jonathan M. Wagner and Adina C. Levine O'Melveny & Myers and Daniel H. Bookin, Roberta H. Vespremi and Sara M. Folchi
    Case Number: No. H037428

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1941REBECCA PROCTOR al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC.