• Vinson Minerals, Ltd v. XTO Energy, Inc. Appellee

    Publication Date: 2010-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Terrie Livingston Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 02-08-00453-CV

    OPINIONI. INTRODUCTIONAppellants Vinson Minerals, Ltd., Johnny H. Vinson, and Chisholm 2000, L.P. (the Vinsons) and Appellee XTO Energy, Inc. (XTO) filed cross-motions for summary judgment on

  • May 1, 2005 | The American Lawyer

    High-Tech, Low Tech

    The case against American Tobacco Company, Inc., was built on hard work and clever legal argument, but, as is so often true, it also was held together with technology that helped the lawyers b

    1 minute read

  • Kennemur v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-08
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-07-0096-CR

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.OPINIONAppellant, Kevin Dwayne Kennemur, was convicted by a jury of intoxication manslaughter and sentenced to forty years confinement. By three i

  • David J. Spiva v. Michael J. Astrue

    Publication Date: 2011-02-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-06
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Posner, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-2083

    ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 2010Before POSNER, TINDER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.In Parker v. Astrue, 597 F.3d 920 (7th Cir. 2010), we criticized the handling of social security disability claims in t

  • Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v H R Block Tax Servs., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-03-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 4237N

    Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, McGuire, Moskowitz, Renwick, JJ. 4237N Index 1726/07 In re New York State Division of Human Rights, Petitioner-Respondent, v H&R

  • In re Kings Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-13
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Anne Gardner Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2-08-394-CV

    ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGOPINIONRelator Kings Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc. ("HOA") petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus complaining that Respondent, the trial judge of the 362nd District

  • Burkina Wear, Inc., Plaintiff v. Campagnolo, S.R.L., Defendant, 07 Civ. 3610 (RWS)

    Publication Date: 2011-01-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert W. Sweet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Carmen S. Giordano, Esq., New York, NY
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: By: Anthony S. Volpe, Esq., John J. O'Malley, Esq., Volpe and Koenig, P.C., Philadelphia, PA By: Matthew C. Wagner, Esq., Jeffrey A. Lindenbaum, Esq., Collen IP, Ossining, NY

    Case Number: 07 Civ. 3610 (RWS)

    Cite as: Burkina Wear, Inc. v. Campagnolo, S.R.L., 07 Civ. 3610 (RWS), NYLJ 1202478476370, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 5, 2011)District Judge Robert W. Sweet/

  • October 7, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Job Bias Challenge Opens New Term

    The first case on the first day of the new U.S. Supreme Court term dash;an age discrimination challenge dash;left a number of justices wondering why they had taken it

    1 minute read

  • Stewart v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-08-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 6
    Judge: Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-08-00009-CR

    Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.Concurring Opinion by Justice CarterOPINIONIn a Van Zandt County*fn1 jury trial, William James Stewart was convi

  • In Re Wireless Telephone Services Antitrust Litigation

    Publication Date: 2003-08-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Plaintiffs bring this antitrust class action against the five families of companies that provide nationwide wireless telephone service. Plaintiffs contend that each defendant's power in the market