• Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2008-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-17
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Linn, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiffs-cross-appellants: Lawrence Walders, Sidley Austin, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For defendants-appellants: Maame Ewusi-Mensah, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; John Shane, Wiley Rein, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: Nos. 2007-1226, -1227, -1254

    Before LOURIE, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.In this antidumping case, we are asked to determine the scope of the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce's") authority to reopen proceedings tainted b

  • Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Bancorp Services, L.L.C.

    Publication Date: 2008-06-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-02
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Dyk, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellants: Charles Verhoeven, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, San Francisco.
    for defendant: For appellee: Joseph Guerra, Sidley Austin, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: 2007-1312

    Published opinionBefore MAYER, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.Appellants Bancorp Services, L.L.C., and Benefit Finance Partners, L.L.C., (collectively "Bancorp") appeal the order of the District

  • Broadcom Corp. v. International Trade Commission

    Publication Date: 2008-09-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-19
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Bryson, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellant: Robert Van Nest, Keker & Van Nest, San Francisco.
    for defendant: For appellee: Michael Liberman, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. For intervenor Qualcomm Inc.: Stephen Kinnaird, Sidley Austin, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: 2007-1164

    Published opinionBefore RADER, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.This appeal arises out of an investigation by the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U

  • Medtronic, Inc. v. White

    Publication Date: 2008-05-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Linda F. Callison and Gordon C. Atkinson, Cooley Godward LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the intervenor-appellant.
    for defendant: Mark E. Haddad, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.

    Case Number: 06-16229

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5794MEDTRONIC, INC., Plaintiff,andLOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER, Intervenor-Appellant,v.GEOFFREY WHI

  • June 5, 2009 | National Law Journal

    Parties seek review of federal decision upholding controversial patent rules

    Pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline PLC and inventor Triantafyllos Tafas have each petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for an en banc rehearing of a March 20 d

    1 minute read

  • July 17, 2013 | The Recorder

    In Practice: Right to Be Patented

    The statutory language, on the books for more than six decades, seems simple: If someone "invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of ma

    1 minute read

  • Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Before: WALLACE, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., Christopher Wion, Shane P. Cramer, Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP, Seattle, WA; David T. Pritikin, Constantine L. Treta, Jr., Richard A. Cederoth, Robert N. Hochman, Nathaniel C. Love, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Andrew Culbert, David E. Killough, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, attorneys for Appellee.
    for defendant: Derek L. Shaffer, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington D.C.; Kathleen M. Sullivan, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for Appellants.

    Case Number: No. 12-35352

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11223MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation,Plaintiff - Appellee,v.MOTOROLA,

  • In re Certain Underwriter Defendants

    Publication Date: 2002-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-01
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Pooler, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-3092

    Argued: February 8, 2002Appeal from the November 28, 2001, opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shira A. Scheindlin, J.) denying appellants'