• September 21, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    An Altered Patent Landscape

    Has U.S. patent protection been diminished by the U.S. Supreme Court? Both the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Federal courts are grappling with this issue in reaction to the

    1 minute read

  • February 5, 2002 | National Law Journal

    Top Plaintiffs' Verdicts

    A look at the top plaintiffs' verdicts of the year 2001, from asbestos to tortious interference. ASBESTOSA BIG WIN IN THE CRADLE OF ASBESTOS LAWSUITSCASE

    1 minute read

  • Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd., Plaintiff v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., Defendant, 12 Civ. 3599

    Publication Date: 2013-03-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert Sweet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff by: Bruce E. Colfin, Esq., Jacobson & Colfin, P.C., New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant by: Michael A. Nicodema, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Florham Park, NJ.

    Case Number: 12 Civ. 3599

    Cite as: Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd. v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., 12 Civ. 3599, NYLJ 1202592454965, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 8, 2013)Distr

  • December 16, 2005 | National Law Journal

    Key Ruling for Business Method Patents

    In September, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, issued a precedential decision, Ex parte Carl A. Lundgren, Appeal No. 2003-2088 (Bd

    1 minute read

  • September 28, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    The Patentability of Drug Enantiomers

    Stereoisomers are big business for the pharmaceutical industry. Stereoisomers are molecules having the same atoms connected in the same way, but with different spatial arrangements around part

    1 minute read

  • Rebecca Meek-Horton, Et Al., on Behalf of Themselves and all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Trover Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Healthcare Recoveries, Et Al., Defendants, 11 CV 6054

    Publication Date: 2013-01-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel: Howard R. Schatz, Silbowitz, Garafola, Silbowitz, Schatz & Frederick, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants Group Health Incorporated, Inc.; HIP of New York, Inc.; HIP of Greater New York, Inc.; and The Rawlings Company, LLC: Richard W. Cohen and Uriel Rabinowitz, Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart, P.C., White Plains, NY. Counsel for Defendants First Recovery Group, LLC; American Progressive Life & Health Insurance Company of New York; Health First, Inc.; and Well Care Health Plans, Inc.: Harold N. Iselin, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Albany, NY. Counsel for Defendants United Healthcare of New York, Inc.; Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.; Ingenix, Inc.: Charles E. Bachman, O'Melveny & Myers, New York, NY. Counsel for Trover Solutions, Inc.: Shawn J. Rabin, Susman Godfrey, New York, NY. Counsel for Defendants Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc.; and Meridian Resource Co., LLC: Kathleen Taylor Sooy, Washington DC.

    Case Number: 11 CV 6054

    Cite as: Rebecca Meek-Horton v. Trover Solutions, Inc., 11 CV 6054, NYLJ 1202583130083, at *1 (SDNY, Decided December 21, 2012)District Judge Robert Patt

  • Medien Patent Verwaltung AG, Plaintiff v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., Defendants, 10 Civ. 4119 (MGC)

    Publication Date: 2010-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: By: Richard M. Garbarini, Esq., Bradley S. Corsello, Esq., Garbarini Law Group P.C., New York, New York
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. and Technicolor Inc., By: Karen L. Hagberg, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, New York By: Vincent J. Belusko, Esq., Brian F. McMahon, Esq., Alex S.F. Yap, Esq., Los Angeles, California Attorneys for Defendant Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc., By: Julie Bookbinder, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, New York

    Case Number: 10 Civ. 4119 (MGC)

    Cite as: Medien Patent Verwaltung AG v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., 10 Civ. 4119 (MGC), NYLJ 1202473789027, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 19, 2010)Judge Mi