Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
22 results for 'Mintz/////// court:"Fed Cir"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-01-03
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:December 29, 2022
Publication Date: 2021-03-25
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | White Collar Crime
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Richard Sullivan
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC and Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd.: Vincent Briganti, Margaret MacLean, Lowey Dannenberg, P.C., White Plains, NY, on the brief, Eric F. Citron, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Bethesda, MD.
For Defendants-Appellees Credit Suisse Group AG, Credit Suisse AG, and Credit Suisse International: Herbert S. Washer, Elai Katz, Jason M. Hall, Lauren Perlgut, Adam S. Mintz, on the brief, Joel Kurtzberg, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.: Arthur J. Burke, Paul S. Mishkin, Adam G. Mehes, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and ANZ Securities, Inc.: Penny Shane, Corey Omer, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., n/k/a MUFG Bank, Ltd.: Christopher M. Viapiano, Elizabeth A. Cassady, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, and Barclays Capital Inc.: Jonathan D. Schiller, Christopher Emmanuel Duffy, Leigh M. Nathanson, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas North America, Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., and BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage, Inc.: Jayant W. Tambe, Stephen J. Obie, Kelly A. Carrero, Jones Day, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Commerzbank AG: David R. Gelfand, Mark D. Villaverde, Milbank LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Crédit Agricole S.A.: Andrew Hammon, Kimberly Anne Havlin, White & Case LLP, New York, NY; Darryl S. Lew, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees DBS Bank Ltd., DBS Group Holdings Ltd., and DBS Vickers Securities (USA) Inc.: Erica S. Weisgerber, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Deutsche Bank AG: Aidan Synnott, Hallie S. Goldblatt, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Macquarie Bank Ltd. and Macquarie Group Ltd.: Christopher M. Paparella, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited: C. Fairley Spillman, Pratik A. Shah, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, and RBS Securities Japan Limited: David S. Lesser, Jamie S. Dycus, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Standard Chartered Bank and Standard Chartered plc: Marc J. Gottridge, Lisa J. Fried, Benjamin A. Fleming, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees United Overseas Bank Limited and UOB Global Capital, LLC: Dale C. Christensen, Jr., Noah Czarny, Seward & Kissel LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC North America Holdings Inc., and HSBC USA Inc.: Nowell D. Bamberger, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC; Charity E. Lee, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees UBS AG and UBS Securities Japan Co., Ltd.: Mark A. Kirsch, Eric J. Stock, Jefferson E. Bell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees ING Groep N.V., ING Bank N.V., and ING Capital Markets LLC.: Amanda F. Davidoff, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC.
Case Number: 19-2719-cv
Real Party in Interest Had Article III Standing at All Times, Could Enter Entities' Shoes
Publication Date: 2020-10-15
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier
Attorneys: For plaintiff: George H. Butcher III, pro se, New Rochelle, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Bradley W. Wendt: Daniel L. Millman, Daniel L. Millman, P.C., Jericho, NY.
Rick Fitzgerald, pro se, Orlando, FL.
Michael D. Cassell, pro se, Hogan & Cassell, LLP, Jericho, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Joseph Farneti: Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Anisha S. Dasgupta, Deputy Solicitor General, on the brief, David Lawrence III, Assistant Solicitor General, for Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, NY.
Case Number: 19-224-cv
CEO's Allegations Against Employees and NY Justice Do Not Support Conspiracy Claims
May 11, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer
How should a court determine whether a patent claim is invalid for obviousness? Recent Federal Circuit decisions reveal that judges answer that question principally in two different ways, and that the difference matters to the outcome of the inquiry.
1 minute read
January 5, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Jurors are often instructed to become time travelers and reconstruct what may have happened "back when."1 The courts have instructed that for jurors facing issues of obv
1 minute read
January 2, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Colleen Tracy James and Daniel Cooper write: To help jurors distinguish the "normal or ordinary" from the "unusual or extraordinary," it seems that identifying a set of decision-making influences, practices, biases or tendencies of a "person of ordinary skill in the art" might be useful. An effort to identify such a matrix might provide a useful guide to jurors faced with the challenge of coming to an understanding of what, why and how a POSA would have made his or her choices at the time of the invention.
1 minute read
July 15, 2014 | New York Law Journal
CLI Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the New York Law Journal's Litigation Special Report on July 14. Widespread losses suffe
1 minute read
July 14, 2014 | New York Law Journal
Widespread losses suffered by many investors during the financial crisis have spawned more than a few fraud claims based upon broadly alleged misconduct affecting many investments or transac
1 minute read
June 12, 2014 |
ELLER MEDIA COMPANY n/k/a CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA and AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES…
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2014-05-23
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff FindTheBest.com, Inc.: Joseph Leventhal, Leventhal Law, LLP, San Diego, CA.
for defendant: For the Defendants Decisionsorter, LLC, The Hillcrest Group, Inc., Eileen C. Shapiro, and Steven J. Mintz: Mark P. Goodman, Carl Riehl, Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, New York, NY. For the Defendant Lumen View Technology, LLC: Stamatios Stamoulis, Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt, LLC, Wilmington, DE.
Case Number: 13 Civ. 6521 (DLC)
Cite as: Findthebest.Com, Inc. v. Lumen View Technology LLC, 13 Civ. 6521 (DLC), NYLJ 1202656360375, at *1 (SDNY, Decided May 19, 2014) 13 Civ. 6521 (DLC)p class="
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
