Filter This View

  • Chiulli v. Internal Revenue Service

    Publication Date: 2005-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Magistrate Judge Pitman I. Introduction Defendant moves to dismiss this action, which seeks the return of a

  • Dorsett v. County of Nassau, CV 10-01258

    Publication Date: 2012-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiffs: By: Frederick K. Brewington, Esq., Valerie M. Cartright, Esq., of Counsel, Law Offices of Frederick K. Brewington, Hempstead, NY
    for defendant: Attorneys for the Defendants: By: Sondra Meryl Toscano, Esq., Liora M. Ben-Sorek, Esq., of Counsel, Office of the Nassau County Attorney, Mineola, NY. Attorneys for the Intervening Party: By: Seth H. Greenberg, Esq., of Counsel, Greenberg Burzichelli Greenberg, P.C., Lake Success, NY. Attorneys for non-party Peter Schmitt: By: Paul F. Millus, Esq., of Counsel, Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: CV 10-01258

    Cite as: Dorsett v. County of Nassau, CV 10-01258, NYLJ 1202558918719, at *1 (EDNY, Decided June 7, 2012)District Judge Arthur D. S

  • Compaq Computer Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    Publication Date: 2002-01-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-28
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Edith H. Jones, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-60648

    Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax CourtIn this case, Compaq Computer Corporation engaged in a foreign stock transaction involving the purchase and resale of American Depository Rece

  • November 17, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Unincorporated Subsidiary May Not Be Purchaser of Property

    Because a division of a corporation cannot own or possess property, the unincorporated subsidiary of a western Pennsylvania steel company cannot be considered the purchaser of a prop

    1 minute read

  • Great American Insurance Co. v. Norwin School District

    Publication Date: 2008-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-29
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Stafford, District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-2441

    PRECEDENTIALARGUED May 20, 2008Before: SMITH and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, and STAFFORD, District Judge.*fn1OPINIONThird-Party Defendant, Foreman Program &

  • In re Peanut Crop Insurance Litigation

    Publication Date: 2008-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-08
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: King, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellants: Jeffrey Clair, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For appellees: Robert Boyce, Boyce & Isley, Raleigh, N.C.
    Case Number: Nos. 07-1145 & 07-1146

    PUBLISHEDMDL-1634Argued: December 5, 2007Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and Henry F. FLOYD, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation

  • Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven M. Watt, Ben Wizner (argued), Jameel Jaffer and Steven R. Shapiro, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York; Ann Brick and Julia Harumi Mass, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, San Francisco, California; Paul Hoffman, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Venice, California; Hope Metcalf, National Litigation Project, Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Clive Stafford-Smith and Zachary KatzNelson, Reprieve, London, England, for plaintiff-appellant Binyam Mohamed. Margaret L. Satterthwaite and Amna Akbar, International Human Rights Clinic, Washington Square Legal Services, Inc., New York, New York, for plaintiff-appellant Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah.
    for defendant: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Paul J. Watford, Mark R. Yohalem and Henry Weissmann, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. Ian Heath Gershengorn, Michael F. Hertz, Joseph P. Russoniello, Douglas N. Letter (argued), Sharon Swingle and Michael P. Abate, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-appellee United States of America. Gary Bostwick and Jean-Paul Jassy, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Los Angeles, California, for amici curiae Professors William G. Weaver and Robert M. Pallitto. Barbara Moses and David J. Stankiewicz, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York, New York; Aziz Huq and Jonathan Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, New York, New York, for amici curiae former United States diplomats. Wiliam J. Aceves, California Western School of Law, San Diego, California; Gerald Staberock and Carlos Lopez, International Commission of Jurists, Geneva, Switzerland; Carla Ferstman, Lorna McGregor and Lucy Moxham, REDRESS, London, United Kingdom; Denna R. Hurwitz, Human Rights Program, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia, for amici curiae REDRESS and the International Commission of Jurists. Stephen I. Vladeck, American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.; Natalie L. Bridgeman, Law Offices of Natalie L. Bridgeman, San Francisco, California, for amici curiae professors of constitutional law, federal jurisdiction and foreign relations law. Andrew G. McBride, Thomas R. McCarthy and Stephen J. Obermeier, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Daniel J. Popeo and Richard A. Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., for amici curiae Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation. Richard R. Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, California; Cindy A. Cohn, Lee Tien, Kurt Opsahl, Kevin S. Bankston, Corynne Mcherry and James S. Tyre, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation. James M. Ringer, Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, New York, for amici curiae Commonwealth Lawyers Association and JUSTICE.
    Case Number: No. 08-15693

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11814 BINYAM MOHAMED; ABOU ELKASSIM BRITEL; AHMED AGIZA; MOHAMED FARAG AHMAD BASHMILAH; BISHER AL-RAWI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, p class=

  • December 1, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    LLCs and the Passive Loss Rules: the Case Law, Part III

    The last column1 discussed limited partnership interests and limite

    1 minute read

  • Brooks-Ngwenya v. Indianapolis Public Schools

    Publication Date: 2009-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-15
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-1973

    SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 11, 2009Before POSNER, WILLIAMS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.Angela Brooks-Ngwenya claims that the Indianapolis Public Schools infringed a copyrighted educational program that

  • Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-07-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-05
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 00-3147

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. PIERSOL, District Judge.This appeal revolves around a loan that was made by Brenton First NationalBank (the Bank)