• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Loudermilk

    Publication Date: 2014-07-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kohler, Laura E. Ashby Miller & Martin PLLC, Atlanta, Charles B. Lee Miller & Martin PLLC, Chattanooga, Tenn., James S. Watson, and David C. Joseph Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Arlington, Va., for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert R. Ambler Jr. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice PLLC, Robert R. Long IV, Elizabeth G. Greenman, Steven M. Collins Alston & Bird LLP, Jeffrey J. Swart, Atlanta, and Brian D. Boone Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, N.C., for appellees. Amicus Appellee: William W. Banks Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Stephanie Burnham, Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Carey, John R. Bielema Jr. Bryan Cave LLP, W. Scott Sorrels, Thomas W. Curvin, Valerie S. Sanders, Samuel J. Casey, Nkoyo-Ene R. Eiffiong Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Atlanta, Joseph J. Reilly, and Katherine B. Katz BuckleySandler LLP, Washington, D. C.

    Case Number: S14Q0454

    The business judgment rule generally precludes claims sounding in ordinary negligence against officers and directors of both corporations and banks for their business decisions, except to the extent

  • July 11, 2014 | Daily Report Online

    Judges Skirt Ruling that Favors Lenders

    A decision issued last summer by the Georgia Court of Appeals had the potential to make it much easier for real estate lenders to recover all of their money when loans go bad, but some trial

    1 minute read

  • Zywiciel v. Historic Westside Village Partners LLC

    Publication Date: 2011-12-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kwame L. Townes, Tucker, for Zywiciel. Kenneth W. Muhammad The Muhammad Firm, Smyrna, for Muhammad. Ernest L. Greer, Michael J. King Greenberg Traurig LLP, Hayden R. Pace Pace Law PC, and Michael E. Ross Taylor English Duma LLP, Michael P. Froman, Atlanta, for appellees.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1243; A11A1582

    An easement existed in a section of road running between arties' properties because both properties descended from same original subdivision described on the recorded plat, despite the fact tha

  • Medina v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-12-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard T. Taylor Taylor & Viers, Atlanta, for appellant. Rosanna M. Szabo, Solicitor General, Karen M. Seeley and Ramsey R. Magaro Solicitor General's Office, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1322

    The Mexican immigrant defendant lacked standing to challenge OCGA § 40-5-20 based on its alleged inconsistency with the 1943 Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Tr

  • State v. Austin

    Publication Date: 2011-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Amelia G. Pray, Ann B. Harris, Assistant District Attorneys, John R. Edwards and Anna G. Cross District Attorney's Office, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas E. Griner, Marietta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A11A0601

    The mere fact that the defendant was placed in handcuffs for his own protection did not, in and of itself, render involuntary his consent to show police the gun he had

  • Davenport v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Cinque M. Axam Axam-Roberts Legal Group, Riverdale, for Davenport. Robert L. Mack Jr. Mack & Harris PC, Stockbridge, for Walsh. Tracy G. Lawson, District Attorney, and Anece Baxter, Assistant District Attorney, Jonesboro, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A10A1750; A10A1751

    The trial judge did not err in commenting on venue and the open-container charge after both the state and defense rested because the comments were made outside the jury's presence, the case was reop

  • Giacomantonio v. Romagnoli

    Publication Date: 2010-09-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackburn, G. Alan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John M. Gross and Ramsey A. Knowles Taylor English Duma LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Walter H. Bush Jr. and Christopher B. Freeman Carlton Fields PA, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A10A1934

    The appellant could ssert that he was entitled to injunctive relief, which would maker parts of the parties' restaurant operation and supply companies' operating agreements invalid, since he di

  • Preval v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sheueli C. Wang Georgia Public Defender Standards Council Appellate Division, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Tommy K. Floyd, District Attorney, Alicia C. Gant and Thomas L. Williams, Assistant District Attorneys, McDonough, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A2384

    The state used the same 17.54 pounds of seized marijuana to prove that Preval both possessed a trafficking weight of marijuana and manufactur

  • Capital Color Printing Inc. v. Ahern

    Publication Date: 2008-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A07A1875

    The trial court erred in ruling that the guaranty at issue did not satisfy the Statute of Frauds for its failure to adequately identify the principal d

  • Capital Color Printing Inc. v. Ahern

    Publication Date: 2008-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A07A1875

    The trial court erred in ruling that the guaranty at issue did not satisfy the Statute of Frauds for its failure to adequately identify the principal d