Filter This View

  • Alexander v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-03-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-11
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 6
    Judge: Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-08-00176-CR

    Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.OPINIONAt Detwonne Monshay Alexander's jury trial in Lamar County leading to his conviction*fn1 for delivery of a c

  • Millenium Expressions Inc. v. Chauss Marketing Ltd.,02 Civ. 7545

    Publication Date: 2007-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-03-30
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: James Francis
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Francis This case illustrates the perils of acting rashly. Jamie

  • Riehm v. Engelking

    Publication Date: 2008-08-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-15
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Gruender, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1517

    Submitted: November 13, 2007Before MURPHY, HANSEN and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.David Riehm was a high school student who wrote an essay detailing a fantasy murder-suicide inspired by the school

  • S.D. v. Dept. of Human Services, Div. of Family Development

    Publication Date: 2001-10-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-10
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Winkelstein, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-5342-99T5

    As amended January 4, 2002.NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONSubmitted September 12, 2001S.D. appeals from a final order of the Department of Human Services (D

  • Kendall v. Kendall

    Publication Date: 2011-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-24
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NOS. 01-09-00948-CV,, 01-10-00032-CV.

    Opinion issued OPINION This is an appeal from a child support enforcement and modification order. Appellant David Kendall challenges the trial court's jurisdiction

  • People v. Michael Hoffler, 16241

    Publication Date: 2008-06-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-12
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge: Peters
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 16241

    Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Kane and Stein, JJ. APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT Raymond A. Kelly Jr., Albany, for appellant. Richard

  • August 21, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    In-House Counsel as Whistleblower: a Rat Without a Remedy?

    More than 30 years ago, Simon Rifkind wrote: One solution that has been proposed for [the ethical problems faced by lawyers] finds one in loud oppositio

    1 minute read

  • Roemmich v. Eagle Eye Development, LLC

    Publication Date: 2008-05-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-13
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Tashima, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1264

    Submitted: November 16, 2007Before RILEY, TASHIMA,*fn1 and SMITH, Circuit Judges.Plaintiff Bruce Roemmich brought an action against defendants Eagle Eye Develop

  • March 8, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Resale Price Maintenance After 'Leegin'

    In 2007 the U.S. Supreme Court upended 96 years of resale price maintenance (RPM) law and applied the rule of reason, rather than the per se rule, to such agreements.1 See a href="http:

    1 minute read

  • Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. Steely

    Publication Date: 2001-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-30
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 116 MAP 2000, 11

    ARGUED: April 30, 2001OPINIONThe issue to be decided is whether a pollution exclusion clause in a commercial general liability insurance policy precludes coverage for injuries allegedly caused b